Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs KLA Corporation (KLAC)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and KLA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
KLAC
KLA Corporation
$180.64TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs KLAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +3063.6% (+41.3%/yr)KLAC +2853.2% (+40.3%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS KLAC
CLS vs KLAC: by the numbers
- •KLAC is the larger company ($235.97B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 49.29 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •KLAC converts more revenue to profit (35.57% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 14.44% CAGR).
- •KLAC pays a dividend (0.47% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 49.29 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 32.91 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 17.38 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 37.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 39.72 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 1.60% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 61.30% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 41.69% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 35.57% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 76.08% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 35.75% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.47% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 22.92% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 14.44% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 22.23% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 14.04% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 39.61% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or KLAC?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and KLAC at 49.29. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or KLAC?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus KLAC at 14.44%.
- Does CLS or KLAC pay a bigger dividend?
- KLAC pays a dividend (0.47% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or KLAC more profitable?
- KLAC runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus KLAC at 35.57%.
- How have CLS and KLAC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and KLAC delivered 40.45% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioKLA P/E ratioKLA dividend yieldCelestica ROEKLA ROECelestica operating marginKLA operating marginCelestica revenue growthKLA revenue growthCelestica free cash flowKLA free cash flow
Celestica & KLA appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.