Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs KLA Corporation (KLAC)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and KLA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
KLAC
KLA Corporation
$190.80TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs KLAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCLS +3385.3%KLAC +20888.3%KLAC compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CLS KLAC
CLS vs KLAC: by the numbers
- •KLAC is the larger company ($249.24B vs $40.26B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 57.59 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •KLAC converts more revenue to profit (35.66% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 15.21% CAGR).
- •KLAC pays a dividend (0.39% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 57.59 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 54.82 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 20.46 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 45.95 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 0.59 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 46.54 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 1.50% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 61.45% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 41.68% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 35.66% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 80.11% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 36.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.39% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 26.20% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | KLAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 15.21% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 31.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 15.49% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 44.53% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or KLAC?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and KLAC at 57.59. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or KLAC?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus KLAC at 15.21%.
- Does CLS or KLAC pay a bigger dividend?
- KLAC pays a dividend (0.39% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or KLAC more profitable?
- KLAC runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus KLAC at 35.66%.
- How have CLS and KLAC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and KLAC delivered 39.93% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioKLA P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldKLA dividend yieldCelestica ROEKLA ROECelestica operating marginKLA operating marginCelestica revenue growthKLA revenue growthCelestica free cash flowKLA free cash flow
Celestica & KLA appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.