Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; IBKR is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
$91.37Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs IBKR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +3063.6% (+41.3%/yr)IBKR +986.4% (+26.9%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS IBKR
CLS vs IBKR: by the numbers
- •IBKR is the larger company ($157.89B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 36.55 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •IBKR converts more revenue to profit (10.14% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •IBKR grew revenue faster over the past five years (32.59% vs 22.80% CAGR).
- •IBKR pays a dividend (0.37% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | IBKR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 36.55 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 33.83 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 14.22 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 26.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | IBKR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 93.34% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 87.09% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 10.14% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 19.07% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | N/A |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | IBKR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.37% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 13.10% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | IBKR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 32.59% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 29.60% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 42.38% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or IBKR?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and IBKR at 36.55. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or IBKR?
- Over the past five years, IBKR grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus IBKR at 32.59%.
- Does CLS or IBKR pay a bigger dividend?
- IBKR pays a dividend (0.37% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or IBKR more profitable?
- IBKR runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus IBKR at 10.14%.
- How have CLS and IBKR total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and IBKR delivered 26.88% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioInteractive Brokers P/E ratioInteractive Brokers dividend yieldCelestica ROEInteractive Brokers ROECelestica operating marginInteractive Brokers operating marginCelestica revenue growthInteractive Brokers revenue growthCelestica free cash flow
Celestica & Interactive Brokers appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.