Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; IBKR is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
$90.91Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs IBKR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 19yCLS +4758.2%IBKR +1296.8%CLS compounded faster
CLS IBKR
CLS vs IBKR: by the numbers
- •IBKR is the larger company ($157.10B vs $40.26B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 36.91 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •IBKR converts more revenue to profit (10.14% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •IBKR grew revenue faster over the past five years (32.59% vs 22.80% CAGR).
- •IBKR pays a dividend (0.35% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | IBKR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 36.91 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 34.05 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 3.74 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 7.03 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 1.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | IBKR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 93.34% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 87.09% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 10.14% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 19.07% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 17.47% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | IBKR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.35% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 14.69% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | IBKR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 32.59% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 29.60% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 44.39% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or IBKR?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and IBKR at 36.91. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or IBKR?
- Over the past five years, IBKR grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus IBKR at 32.59%.
- Does CLS or IBKR pay a bigger dividend?
- IBKR pays a dividend (0.35% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or IBKR more profitable?
- IBKR runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus IBKR at 10.14%.
- How have CLS and IBKR total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and IBKR delivered 27.42% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioInteractive Brokers P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldInteractive Brokers dividend yieldCelestica ROEInteractive Brokers ROECelestica operating marginInteractive Brokers operating marginCelestica revenue growthInteractive Brokers revenue growthCelestica free cash flowInteractive Brokers free cash flow
Celestica & Interactive Brokers appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.