Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Howmet Aerospace Inc. (HWM)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Howmet Aerospace Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; HWM is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
HWM
Howmet Aerospace Inc.
$229.61IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs HWM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +3063.6% (+41.3%/yr)HWM +987.5% (+27.0%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS HWM
CLS vs HWM: by the numbers
- •HWM is the larger company ($91.87B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 49.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •HWM converts more revenue to profit (20.52% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 13.81% CAGR).
- •HWM pays a dividend (0.22% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | HWM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 49.48 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 43.05 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 10.08 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 16.03 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 33.20 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 1.71% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | HWM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 34.44% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 28.33% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 20.52% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 32.64% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 18.58% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | HWM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.22% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 10.78% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | HWM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 13.81% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 50.70% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 76.77% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 49.26% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or HWM?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and HWM at 49.48. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or HWM?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus HWM at 13.81%.
- Does CLS or HWM pay a bigger dividend?
- HWM pays a dividend (0.22% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or HWM more profitable?
- HWM runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus HWM at 20.52%.
- How have CLS and HWM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and HWM delivered 27.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioHowmet Aerospace P/E ratioHowmet Aerospace dividend yieldCelestica ROEHowmet Aerospace ROECelestica operating marginHowmet Aerospace operating marginCelestica revenue growthHowmet Aerospace revenue growthCelestica free cash flowHowmet Aerospace free cash flow
Celestica & Howmet Aerospace appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.