Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or FN?

CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and FN at 40.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLS or FN?

Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus FN at 18.99%.

Is CLS or FN more profitable?

FN runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus FN at 9.87%.

How have CLS and FN total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and FN delivered 27.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Fabrinet (FN)

A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Fabrinet across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$40.26B

$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Fabrinet

$16.11B

$449.72TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLS vs FN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 16y

CLS +3724.2%FN +4279.7%FN compounded faster

CLS FN

CLS vs FN: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($40.26B vs $16.11B market cap).
•CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 40.45 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FN converts more revenue to profit (9.87% vs 7.16% net margin).
•CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 18.99% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLS	FN
P/E ratio	33.05	40.45
Forward P/E	31.47	34.09
P/S ratio	2.37	4.03
P/B ratio	14.91	7.40
PEG ratio	0.39	2.47
EV / EBITDA	26.58	35.10
FCF yield	1.41%	0.27%

Profitability

Metric	CLS	FN
Gross margin	11.59%	11.96%
Operating margin	8.13%	9.78%
Net margin	7.16%	9.87%
ROE	45.07%	18.14%
ROIC	27.74%	15.01%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLS	FN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.80%	18.99%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	73.33%	24.62%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	29.00%	29.13%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	105.32%	39.14%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or FN?: CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and FN at 40.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLS or FN?: Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus FN at 18.99%.
Is CLS or FN more profitable?: FN runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus FN at 9.87%.
How have CLS and FN total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and FN delivered 27.87% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLS analysis Full FN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celestica P/E ratio Fabrinet P/E ratio Celestica dividend yield Fabrinet dividend yield Celestica ROE Fabrinet ROE Celestica operating margin Fabrinet operating margin Celestica revenue growth Fabrinet revenue growth Celestica free cash flow Fabrinet free cash flow

Celestica & Fabrinet appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.