Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Flex Ltd. (FLEX)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Flex Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$387.32TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT
FLEX
Flex Ltd.
$116.61TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs FLEX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +3380.3% (+42.6%/yr)FLEX +742.9% (+23.8%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS FLEX
CLS vs FLEX: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($44.53B vs $43.08B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (40.22 vs 45.02 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CLS converts more revenue to profit (7.16% vs 3.32% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.77% vs 3.76% CAGR).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | FLEX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.22 | 45.02 |
| Forward P/E | 35.04 | 24.80 |
| PEG ratio | 0.55 | 3.22 |
| P/S ratio | 2.86 | 1.47 |
| P/B ratio | 17.96 | 7.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.77 | 23.59 |
| FCF yield | 1.16% | 2.48% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | FLEX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.95% | 9.49% |
| Operating margin | 8.86% | 5.17% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 3.32% |
| ROE | 45.02% | 17.69% |
| ROIC | 32.38% | 9.65% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | FLEX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.77% | 3.76% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 13.63% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 28.93% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 109.50% | 43.98% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or FLEX?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 40.22 and FLEX at 45.02. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or FLEX?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.77% CAGR versus FLEX at 3.76%.
- Is CLS or FLEX more profitable?
- CLS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus FLEX at 3.32%.
- How have CLS and FLEX total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 42.46% and FLEX delivered 23.54% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioFlex P/E ratioCelestica ROEFlex ROECelestica operating marginFlex operating marginCelestica revenue growthFlex revenue growthCelestica free cash flowFlex free cash flow
Celestica & Flex appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.