Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Enerpac Tool Group Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; EPAC is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EPAC
Enerpac Tool Group Corp.
$37.09IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs EPAC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCLS +3522.3%EPAC +1146.2%CLS compounded faster
CLS EPAC
CLS vs EPAC: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($40.26B vs $1.91B market cap).
- •EPAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (19.71 vs 33.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EPAC converts more revenue to profit (14.72% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 5.10% CAGR).
- •EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 19.71 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 18.70 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 2.84 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 4.24 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 2.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 11.97 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 6.24% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 49.05% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 21.76% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 14.72% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 22.01% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 15.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.11% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 2.33% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | EPAC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 5.10% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 169.53% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 34.85% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 6.62% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or EPAC?
- EPAC has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and EPAC at 19.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or EPAC?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus EPAC at 5.10%.
- Does CLS or EPAC pay a bigger dividend?
- EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or EPAC more profitable?
- EPAC runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus EPAC at 14.72%.
- How have CLS and EPAC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and EPAC delivered 3.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioEnerpac Tool P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldEnerpac Tool dividend yieldCelestica ROEEnerpac Tool ROECelestica operating marginEnerpac Tool operating marginCelestica revenue growthEnerpac Tool revenue growthCelestica free cash flowEnerpac Tool free cash flow
Celestica & Enerpac Tool appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.