Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; EME is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
$705.82IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs EME
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCLS +3522.3%EME +16259.0%EME compounded faster
CLS EME
CLS vs EME: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($40.26B vs $31.43B market cap).
- •EME trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.95 vs 33.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EME converts more revenue to profit (7.52% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 15.06% CAGR).
- •EME pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 24.95 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 25.30 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 1.89 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 8.65 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 0.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 17.04 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 3.22% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 19.54% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 9.89% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 7.52% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 34.52% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 24.16% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.18% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 4.61% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 15.06% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 63.55% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 7.48% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 44.05% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or EME?
- EME has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and EME at 24.95. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or EME?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus EME at 15.06%.
- Does CLS or EME pay a bigger dividend?
- EME pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or EME more profitable?
- EME runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus EME at 7.52%.
- How have CLS and EME total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and EME delivered 30.84% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioEMCOR P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldEMCOR dividend yieldCelestica ROEEMCOR ROECelestica operating marginEMCOR operating marginCelestica revenue growthEMCOR revenue growthCelestica free cash flowEMCOR free cash flow
Celestica & EMCOR appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.