Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and EMCOR Group, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; EME is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
$780.66IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs EME
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +3063.6% (+41.3%/yr)EME +1242.0% (+29.7%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS EME
CLS vs EME: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $34.43B market cap).
- •EME trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.39 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •EME converts more revenue to profit (7.72% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 15.06% CAGR).
- •EME pays a dividend (0.19% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 24.39 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 23.69 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 1.85 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 8.44 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 16.37 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 3.40% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 19.66% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 10.15% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 7.72% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 35.21% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 26.94% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.19% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 4.53% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 15.06% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 63.55% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 19.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 45.44% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or EME?
- EME has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and EME at 24.39. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or EME?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus EME at 15.06%.
- Does CLS or EME pay a bigger dividend?
- EME pays a dividend (0.19% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or EME more profitable?
- EME runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus EME at 7.72%.
- How have CLS and EME total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and EME delivered 30.15% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioEMCOR P/E ratioEMCOR dividend yieldCelestica ROEEMCOR ROECelestica operating marginEMCOR operating marginCelestica revenue growthEMCOR revenue growthCelestica free cash flowEMCOR free cash flow
Celestica & EMCOR appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.