Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; CW is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$350.20TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
$728.80IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs CW
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 28yCLS +3385.3%CW +9067.4%CW compounded faster
CLS CW
CLS vs CW: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($40.26B vs $26.92B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (33.05 vs 54.45 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 8.60% CAGR).
- •CW pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | CW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.05 | 54.45 |
| Forward P/E | 31.47 | 48.84 |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 7.64 |
| P/B ratio | 14.91 | 10.47 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 1.94 |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.58 | 35.97 |
| FCF yield | 1.41% | 2.14% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 37.17% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 18.48% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 14.17% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 19.42% |
| ROIC | 27.74% | 12.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.13% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 7.57% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 8.60% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 21.79% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 8.67% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 105.32% | 44.21% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or CW?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 33.05 and CW at 54.45. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or CW?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus CW at 8.60%.
- Does CLS or CW pay a bigger dividend?
- CW pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or CW more profitable?
- CW runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus CW at 14.17%.
- How have CLS and CW total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.11% and CW delivered 23.95% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioCurtiss-Wright P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldCurtiss-Wright dividend yieldCelestica ROECurtiss-Wright ROECelestica operating marginCurtiss-Wright operating marginCelestica revenue growthCurtiss-Wright revenue growthCelestica free cash flowCurtiss-Wright free cash flow
Celestica & Curtiss-Wright appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.