Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS)
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CLS is classified in Technology; CRS is classified in Basic Materials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
$443.19Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CLS vs CRS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCLS +3063.6% (+41.3%/yr)CRS +1295.2% (+30.2%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
CLS CRS
CLS vs CRS: by the numbers
- •CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $22.02B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 42.13 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CRS converts more revenue to profit (16.96% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 16.19% CAGR).
- •CRS pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.99 | 42.13 |
| Forward P/E | 30.38 | 33.23 |
| P/S ratio | 2.55 | 7.05 |
| P/B ratio | 16.07 | 9.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.75 | 26.28 |
| FCF yield | 1.30% | 1.65% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.59% | 30.58% |
| Operating margin | 8.13% | 22.47% |
| Net margin | 7.16% | 16.96% |
| ROE | 45.07% | 23.78% |
| ROIC | 29.75% | 17.08% |
Dividends
| Metric | CLS | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 0.18% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 7.60% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | CRS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 22.80% | 16.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 178.15% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 29.00% | 19.37% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 106.10% | 71.94% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLS or CRS?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: CLS trades at 35.99 and CRS at 42.13. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or CRS?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — CLS at a 22.80% CAGR versus CRS at 16.19%.
- Does CLS or CRS pay a bigger dividend?
- CRS pays a dividend (0.18% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CLS or CRS more profitable?
- CRS runs the higher net margin — CLS at 7.16% versus CRS at 16.96%.
- How have CLS and CRS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CLS delivered 40.78% and CRS delivered 30.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioCarpenter Technology P/E ratioCarpenter Technology dividend yieldCelestica ROECarpenter Technology ROECelestica operating marginCarpenter Technology operating marginCelestica revenue growthCarpenter Technology revenue growthCelestica free cash flowCarpenter Technology free cash flow
Celestica & Carpenter Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.