Celestica Inc. (CLS) vs Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO)
CLS and CRDO are evenly matched — 7 metrics each of 14.
A side-by-side comparison of Celestica Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 29, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$337.53Technology
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
$238.00Technology
Total return — CLS vs CRDO
growth of $100 · last 4yCLS +2799.7%CRDO +1942.9%CLS compounded faster
CLS CRDO
CLS vs CRDO: by the numbers
- •CRDO is the larger company ($44.38B vs $38.81B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower earnings multiple (40.76 vs 95.97 P/E).
- •CRDO converts more revenue to profit (35.37% vs 6.95% net margin).
- •CRDO grew revenue faster over the past five years (86.69% vs 19.51% CAGR).
Which is better, CLS or CRDO?
Metric tally: CLS 7 · CRDO 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCLS(lower P/E)
GrowthCRDO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCLS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CLS | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 40.76● | 95.97 |
| Forward P/E | 34.01 | 26.85● |
| P/S ratio | 2.83● | 34.35 |
| P/B ratio | 19.07● | 22.22 |
| PEG ratio | 0.39 | 0.09● |
| EV / EBITDA | 31.28● | 93.15 |
| FCF yield | 1.26%● | 0.89% |
Profitability
| Metric | CLS | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 11.61% | 68.04%● |
| Operating margin | 7.84% | 33.33%● |
| Net margin | 6.95% | 35.37%● |
| ROE | 46.86%● | 22.89% |
| ROIC | 27.74%● | 21.06% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CLS | CRDO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 19.51% | 86.69%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 73.33% | 129.03%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 26.52% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 110.78% | — |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CLS or CRDO?
- It depends on your goal. value: CLS (lower P/E); growth: CRDO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CLS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is CLS or CRDO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CLS is cheaper: CLS trades at a 40.76 P/E and CRDO at 95.97.
- Which has grown faster, CLS or CRDO?
- Over the past five years, CRDO grew revenue faster — CLS at a 19.51% CAGR versus CRDO at 86.69%.
- Is CLS or CRDO more profitable?
- CRDO runs the higher net margin — CLS at 6.95% versus CRDO at 35.37%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celestica P/E ratioCredo Technology Group P/E ratioCelestica dividend yieldCredo Technology Group dividend yieldCelestica ROECredo Technology Group ROECelestica operating marginCredo Technology Group operating marginCelestica revenue growthCredo Technology Group revenue growthCelestica free cash flowCredo Technology Group free cash flow
Celestica & Credo Technology Group appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 29, 2026.