Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLMB or PRTH?

PRTH has the lower trailing P/E: CLMB trades at 29.42 and PRTH at 11.44. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CLMB or PRTH?

Over the past five years, CLMB grew revenue faster — CLMB at a 21.35% CAGR versus PRTH at 17.15%.

Does CLMB or PRTH pay a bigger dividend?

CLMB pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while PRTH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CLMB or PRTH more profitable?

PRTH runs the higher net margin — CLMB at 2.88% versus PRTH at 5.61%.

How have CLMB and PRTH total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CLMB delivered 39.44% and PRTH delivered 5.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Climb Global Solutions, Inc. (CLMB) vs Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH)

A side-by-side comparison of Climb Global Solutions, Inc. and Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CLMB

Climb Global Solutions, Inc.

$612M

$32.80TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PRTH

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.

$641M

$7.78TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CLMB vs PRTH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CLMB +894.0% (+25.8%/yr)PRTH -20.6% (-2.3%/yr)CLMB compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CLMB PRTH

CLMB vs PRTH: by the numbers

•PRTH is the larger company ($641M vs $612M market cap).
•PRTH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.44 vs 29.42 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PRTH converts more revenue to profit (5.61% vs 2.88% net margin).
•CLMB grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.35% vs 17.15% CAGR).
•CLMB pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while PRTH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CLMB	PRTH
P/E ratio	29.42	11.44
Forward P/E	23.47	7.29
PEG ratio	0.82	0.93
P/S ratio	0.86	0.64
P/B ratio	4.90	N/A
EV / EBITDA	15.30	4.51
FCF yield	6.70%	16.19%

Profitability

Metric	CLMB	PRTH
Gross margin	15.77%	21.38%
Operating margin	3.94%	13.77%
Net margin	2.88%	5.61%
ROE	16.43%	N/A
ROIC	15.40%	13.53%

Dividends

Metric	CLMB	PRTH
Dividend yield	0.13%	N/A
Payout ratio	3.81%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CLMB	PRTH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	21.35%	17.15%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	35.66%	13.00%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-17.38%	65.71%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	39.44%	5.80%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CLMB or PRTH?: PRTH has the lower trailing P/E: CLMB trades at 29.42 and PRTH at 11.44. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CLMB or PRTH?: Over the past five years, CLMB grew revenue faster — CLMB at a 21.35% CAGR versus PRTH at 17.15%.
Does CLMB or PRTH pay a bigger dividend?: CLMB pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while PRTH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CLMB or PRTH more profitable?: PRTH runs the higher net margin — CLMB at 2.88% versus PRTH at 5.61%.
How have CLMB and PRTH total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CLMB delivered 39.44% and PRTH delivered 5.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CLMB analysis Full PRTH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Climb Global Solutions P/E ratio Priority Technology P/E ratio Climb Global Solutions dividend yield Climb Global Solutions ROE Priority Technology ROE Climb Global Solutions operating margin Priority Technology operating margin Climb Global Solutions revenue growth Priority Technology revenue growth Climb Global Solutions free cash flow Priority Technology free cash flow

Climb Global Solutions & Priority Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.