Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)
PM leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$92.07Consumer Defensive
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
$180.77Consumer Defensive
Total return — CL vs PM
growth of $100 · last 18yCL +140.2%PM +266.0%PM compounded faster
CL PM
CL vs PM: by the numbers
- •PM is the larger company ($281.74B vs $73.67B market cap).
- •PM trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.42 vs 35.77 P/E).
- •PM converts more revenue to profit (26.74% vs 10.04% net margin).
- •PM grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.34% vs 4.46% CAGR).
- •PM pays the higher dividend yield (3.25% vs 2.30%).
Which is better, CL or PM?
Metric tally: CL 5 · PM 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValuePM(lower P/E)
GrowthPM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomePM(higher dividend yield)
QualityCL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.77 | 25.42● |
| Forward P/E | 22.83 | 19.81● |
| P/S ratio | 3.56● | 6.81 |
| P/B ratio | 511.21 | — |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.00● | 19.01 |
| FCF yield | 5.08%● | 3.78% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.06% | 67.30%● |
| Operating margin | 21.21% | 36.83%● |
| Net margin | 10.04% | 26.74%● |
| ROE | 1439.31%● | -113.55% |
| ROIC | 30.34%● | 25.56% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.30% | 3.25%● |
| Payout ratio | 80.30% | 80.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.46% | 7.34%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 7.10%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 3.88% | 4.58%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.93% | 17.89%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CL or PM?
- It depends on your goal. value: PM (lower P/E); growth: PM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: PM (higher dividend yield); quality: CL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PM leads 10 to 5.
- Is CL or PM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, PM is cheaper: CL trades at a 35.77 P/E and PM at 25.42.
- Which has grown faster, CL or PM?
- Over the past five years, PM grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.46% CAGR versus PM at 7.34%.
- Does CL or PM pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.30% and PM yields 3.25% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or PM more profitable?
- PM runs the higher net margin — CL at 10.04% versus PM at 26.74%.
- Which has been the better investment, CL or PM?
- Over the past 10-year, PM delivered the higher annualized total return — CL at 5.14% versus PM at 11.61%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioPhilip Morris International P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldPhilip Morris International dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEPhilip Morris International ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginPhilip Morris International operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthPhilip Morris International revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowPhilip Morris International free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Philip Morris International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.