Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Philip Morris International Inc. (PM)
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Philip Morris International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 12, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$92.53Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT
PM
Philip Morris International Inc.
$185.64Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 11:10 AM EDT
Total return — CL vs PM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCL +57.9% (+4.7%/yr)PM +207.5% (+11.9%/yr)PM compounded faster over this window
CL PM
CL vs PM: by the numbers
- •PM is the larger company ($289.34B vs $74.04B market cap).
- •PM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (26.72 vs 36.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PM converts more revenue to profit (25.56% vs 9.68% net margin).
- •PM grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.19% vs 4.26% CAGR).
- •PM pays the higher dividend yield (3.16% vs 2.27%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.57 | 26.72 |
| Forward P/E | 24.15 | 22.23 |
| P/S ratio | 3.53 | 6.83 |
| P/B ratio | 315.19 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 16.21 | 18.43 |
| FCF yield | 5.19% | 4.38% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.42% | 67.51% |
| Operating margin | 20.65% | 37.75% |
| Net margin | 9.68% | 25.56% |
| ROE | 863.14% | -113.55% |
| ROIC | 30.34% | 25.56% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 3.16% |
| Payout ratio | 79.55% | 80.88% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | PM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.26% | 7.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 7.10% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.70% | 4.43% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.62% | 18.68% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CL or PM?
- PM has the lower trailing P/E: CL trades at 36.57 and PM at 26.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CL or PM?
- Over the past five years, PM grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.26% CAGR versus PM at 7.19%.
- Does CL or PM pay a bigger dividend?
- CL yields 2.27% and PM yields 3.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CL or PM more profitable?
- PM runs the higher net margin — CL at 9.68% versus PM at 25.56%.
- How have CL and PM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CL delivered 4.55% and PM delivered 11.92% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioPhilip Morris International P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldPhilip Morris International dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEPhilip Morris International ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginPhilip Morris International operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthPhilip Morris International revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowPhilip Morris International free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Philip Morris International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 12, 2026.