Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) vs Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH)
A side-by-side comparison of Colgate-Palmolive Company and Manhattan Associates, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CL is classified in Consumer Defensive; MANH is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CL
Colgate-Palmolive Company
$86.80Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
$201.82TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CL vs MANH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCL +52.5% (+4.3%/yr)MANH +249.4% (+13.3%/yr)MANH compounded faster over this window
CL MANH
CL vs MANH: by the numbers
- •CL is the larger company ($69.46B vs $11.77B market cap).
- •CL trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.39 vs 57.83 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MANH converts more revenue to profit (18.67% vs 9.68% net margin).
- •MANH grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.69% vs 4.26% CAGR).
- •CL pays a dividend (2.39% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CL | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 34.39 | 57.83 |
| Forward P/E | 22.44 | 36.71 |
| P/S ratio | 3.30 | 10.45 |
| P/B ratio | 294.31 | 74.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.23 | 41.45 |
| FCF yield | 5.55% | 3.39% |
Profitability
| Metric | CL | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 60.42% | 54.65% |
| Operating margin | 20.65% | 24.33% |
| Net margin | 9.68% | 18.67% |
| ROE | 863.14% | 133.48% |
| ROIC | 29.91% | 90.92% |
Dividends
| Metric | CL | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.39% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 83.20% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CL | MANH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.26% | 12.69% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -3.47% | 21.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.70% | 19.51% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.14% | 4.78% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CL or MANH?
- CL has the lower trailing P/E: CL trades at 34.39 and MANH at 57.83. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CL or MANH?
- Over the past five years, MANH grew revenue faster — CL at a 4.26% CAGR versus MANH at 12.69%.
- Does CL or MANH pay a bigger dividend?
- CL pays a dividend (2.39% yield), while MANH has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CL or MANH more profitable?
- MANH runs the higher net margin — CL at 9.68% versus MANH at 18.67%.
- How have CL and MANH total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CL delivered 4.62% and MANH delivered 13.30% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Colgate-Palmolive P/E ratioManhattan Associates P/E ratioColgate-Palmolive dividend yieldColgate-Palmolive ROEManhattan Associates ROEColgate-Palmolive operating marginManhattan Associates operating marginColgate-Palmolive revenue growthManhattan Associates revenue growthColgate-Palmolive free cash flowManhattan Associates free cash flow
Colgate-Palmolive & Manhattan Associates appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.