Which has the lower trailing P/E, CI or MCK?

CI has the lower trailing P/E: CI trades at 11.55 and MCK at 22.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CI or MCK?

Over the past five years, MCK grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.11% CAGR versus MCK at 11.11%.

Does CI or MCK pay a bigger dividend?

CI yields 2.20% and MCK yields 0.38% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CI or MCK more profitable?

CI runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.27% versus MCK at 1.18%.

How have CI and MCK total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CI delivered 9.12% and MCK delivered 16.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cigna Corporation (CI) vs McKesson Corporation (MCK)

A side-by-side comparison of Cigna Corporation and McKesson Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Cigna Corporation

$73.74B

$279.05HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MCK

McKesson Corporation

$100.24B

$856.19HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CI vs MCK

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y

CI +2898.9%MCK +4961.3%MCK compounded faster

CI MCK

CI vs MCK: by the numbers

•MCK is the larger company ($100.24B vs $73.74B market cap).
•CI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.55 vs 22.26 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CI converts more revenue to profit (2.27% vs 1.18% net margin).
•CI pays the higher dividend yield (2.20% vs 0.38%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CI	MCK
P/E ratio	11.55	22.26
Forward P/E	9.16	21.95
P/S ratio	0.26	0.26
P/B ratio	1.73	N/A
PEG ratio	0.15	0.46
EV / EBITDA	8.49	15.45
FCF yield	12.38%	5.65%

Profitability

Metric	CI	MCK
Gross margin	11.66%	3.61%
Operating margin	3.46%	1.58%
Net margin	2.27%	1.18%
ROE	15.05%	-219.24%
ROIC	7.35%	31.48%

Dividends

Metric	CI	MCK
Dividend yield	2.20%	0.38%
Payout ratio	27.53%	8.51%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CI	MCK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.11%	11.11%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.76%	40.71%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.95%	8.76%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.91%	33.96%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CI or MCK?: CI has the lower trailing P/E: CI trades at 11.55 and MCK at 22.26. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CI or MCK?: Over the past five years, MCK grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.11% CAGR versus MCK at 11.11%.
Does CI or MCK pay a bigger dividend?: CI yields 2.20% and MCK yields 0.38% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CI or MCK more profitable?: CI runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.27% versus MCK at 1.18%.
How have CI and MCK total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CI delivered 9.12% and MCK delivered 16.86% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CI analysis Full MCK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cigna P/E ratio McKesson P/E ratio Cigna dividend yield McKesson dividend yield Cigna ROE McKesson ROE Cigna operating margin McKesson operating margin Cigna revenue growth McKesson revenue growth Cigna free cash flow McKesson free cash flow

Cigna & McKesson appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 2, 2026.