Is CI or MCK cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: CI trades at a 11.84 P/E and MCK at 19.51.

Which has grown faster, CI or MCK?

Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.28% CAGR versus MCK at 11.11%.

Does CI or MCK pay a bigger dividend?

CI yields 2.20% and MCK yields 0.44% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CI or MCK more profitable?

CI runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.26% versus MCK at 1.18%.

Which has been the better investment, CI or MCK?

Over the past 10-year, MCK delivered the higher annualized total return — CI at 9.08% versus MCK at 16.38%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cigna Corporation (CI) vs McKesson Corporation (MCK)

CI leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Cigna Corporation and McKesson Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — CI vs MCK

growth of $100 · last 30y

CI +2146.7%MCK +3003.1%MCK compounded faster

CI MCK

CI vs MCK: by the numbers

•MCK is the larger company ($87.88B vs $73.88B market cap).
•CI trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.84 vs 19.51 P/E).
•CI converts more revenue to profit (2.26% vs 1.18% net margin).
•CI grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 11.11% CAGR).
•CI pays the higher dividend yield (2.20% vs 0.44%).

Which is better, CI or MCK?

Metric tally: CI 10 · MCK 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCI(lower P/E)

IncomeCI(higher dividend yield)

QualityMCK(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CI	MCK
P/E ratio	11.84●	19.51
Forward P/E	8.36●	14.90
P/S ratio	0.27	0.23●
P/B ratio	1.75	—
PEG ratio	0.15●	0.46
EV / EBITDA	8.00●	13.79
FCF yield	10.38%●	6.44%

Profitability

Metric	CI	MCK
Gross margin	9.30%●	3.61%
Operating margin	3.42%●	1.58%
Net margin	2.26%●	1.18%
ROE	14.90%●	-219.24%
ROIC	7.35%	31.48%●

Dividends

Metric	CI	MCK
Dividend yield	2.20%●	0.44%
Payout ratio	27.53%	8.51%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CI	MCK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.28%	11.11%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.76%	40.71%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-2.03%	8.76%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.71%	33.07%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CI or MCK?: It depends on your goal. value: CI (lower P/E); income: CI (higher dividend yield); quality: MCK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CI leads 10 to 5.
Is CI or MCK cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CI is cheaper: CI trades at a 11.84 P/E and MCK at 19.51.
Which has grown faster, CI or MCK?: Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.28% CAGR versus MCK at 11.11%.
Does CI or MCK pay a bigger dividend?: CI yields 2.20% and MCK yields 0.44% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CI or MCK more profitable?: CI runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.26% versus MCK at 1.18%.
Which has been the better investment, CI or MCK?: Over the past 10-year, MCK delivered the higher annualized total return — CI at 9.08% versus MCK at 16.38%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CI analysis Full MCK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cigna P/E ratio McKesson P/E ratio Cigna dividend yield McKesson dividend yield Cigna ROE McKesson ROE Cigna operating margin McKesson operating margin Cigna revenue growth McKesson revenue growth Cigna free cash flow McKesson free cash flow

Cigna & McKesson appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.