Which has the lower trailing P/E, CI or HUM?

CI has the lower trailing P/E: CI trades at 11.62 and HUM at 38.81. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CI or HUM?

Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.11% CAGR versus HUM at 12.61%.

Does CI or HUM pay a bigger dividend?

CI yields 2.20% and HUM yields 0.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CI or HUM more profitable?

CI runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.27% versus HUM at 0.88%.

How have CI and HUM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CI delivered 9.30% and HUM delivered 9.46% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Cigna Corporation (CI) vs Humana Inc. (HUM)

A side-by-side comparison of Cigna Corporation and Humana Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 11, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Cigna Corporation

$74.19B

$280.76HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

HUM

Humana Inc.

$49.21B

$409.85HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CI vs HUM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CI +137.5% (+9.0%/yr)HUM +149.9% (+9.6%/yr)HUM compounded faster over this window

CI HUM

CI vs HUM: by the numbers

•CI is the larger company ($74.19B vs $49.21B market cap).
•CI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.62 vs 38.81 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CI converts more revenue to profit (2.27% vs 0.88% net margin).
•HUM grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.61% vs 11.11% CAGR).
•CI pays the higher dividend yield (2.20% vs 0.88%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CI	HUM
P/E ratio	11.62	38.81
Forward P/E	9.20	44.77
P/S ratio	0.26	0.34
P/B ratio	1.74	2.56
EV / EBITDA	8.08	20.40
FCF yield	12.28%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	CI	HUM
Gross margin	11.66%	13.65%
Operating margin	3.46%	1.39%
Net margin	2.27%	0.88%
ROE	15.05%	6.65%
ROIC	7.69%	4.52%

Dividends

Metric	CI	HUM
Dividend yield	2.20%	0.88%
Payout ratio	25.62%	33.52%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CI	HUM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.11%	12.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-0.76%	-17.27%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-1.95%	-17.19%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.53%	0.94%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CI or HUM?: CI has the lower trailing P/E: CI trades at 11.62 and HUM at 38.81. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CI or HUM?: Over the past five years, HUM grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.11% CAGR versus HUM at 12.61%.
Does CI or HUM pay a bigger dividend?: CI yields 2.20% and HUM yields 0.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CI or HUM more profitable?: CI runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.27% versus HUM at 0.88%.
How have CI and HUM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CI delivered 9.30% and HUM delivered 9.46% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CI analysis Full HUM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Cigna P/E ratio Humana P/E ratio Cigna dividend yield Humana dividend yield Cigna ROE Humana ROE Cigna operating margin Humana operating margin Cigna revenue growth Humana revenue growth Cigna free cash flow Humana free cash flow

Cigna & Humana appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 11, 2026.