Cigna Corporation (CI) vs GSK plc (GSK)
GSK leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Cigna Corporation and GSK plc across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — CI vs GSK
growth of $100 · last 30yCI +2099.0%GSK +98.1%CI compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CI GSK
CI vs GSK: by the numbers
- •GSK is the larger company ($105.20B vs $74.81B market cap).
- •GSK trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.62 vs 11.99 P/E).
- •GSK converts more revenue to profit (17.76% vs 2.26% net margin).
- •CI grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.28% vs 0.63% CAGR).
- •GSK pays the higher dividend yield (3.51% vs 2.21%).
Which is better, CI or GSK?
Metric tally: CI 6 · GSK 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGSK(lower P/E)
GrowthCI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGSK(higher dividend yield)
QualityGSK(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CI | GSK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.99 | 11.62● |
| Forward P/E | 8.46● | 13.25 |
| P/S ratio | 0.27● | 2.42 |
| P/B ratio | 1.77● | 3.44 |
| PEG ratio | 0.15 | 0.02● |
| EV / EBITDA | 8.13● | 8.62 |
| FCF yield | 10.26%● | 7.87% |
Profitability
| Metric | CI | GSK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 9.30% | 72.67%● |
| Operating margin | 3.42% | 25.65%● |
| Net margin | 2.26% | 17.76%● |
| ROE | 14.90% | 25.19%● |
| ROIC | 7.35% | 16.61%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CI | GSK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 3.51%● |
| Payout ratio | 27.98% | 24.30% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CI | GSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.28%● | 0.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.76% | 14.05%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -2.03% | -0.35%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.50% | 10.18%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CI or GSK?
- It depends on your goal. value: GSK (lower P/E); growth: CI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GSK (higher dividend yield); quality: GSK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GSK leads 11 to 6.
- Is CI or GSK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GSK is cheaper: CI trades at a 11.99 P/E and GSK at 11.62.
- Which has grown faster, CI or GSK?
- Over the past five years, CI grew revenue faster — CI at a 11.28% CAGR versus GSK at 0.63%.
- Does CI or GSK pay a bigger dividend?
- CI yields 2.21% and GSK yields 3.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CI or GSK more profitable?
- GSK runs the higher net margin — CI at 2.26% versus GSK at 17.76%.
- Which has been the better investment, CI or GSK?
- Over the past 10-year, CI delivered the higher annualized total return — CI at 9.32% versus GSK at 7.50%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Cigna P/E ratioGSK P/E ratioCigna dividend yieldGSK dividend yieldCigna ROEGSK ROECigna operating marginGSK operating marginCigna revenue growthGSK revenue growthCigna free cash flowGSK free cash flow
Cigna & GSK appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.