Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHWY or LULU?

LULU has the lower trailing P/E: CHWY trades at 51.43 and LULU at 8.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CHWY or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — CHWY at a 10.72% CAGR versus LULU at 14.96%.

Is CHWY or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — CHWY at 1.57% versus LULU at 12.78%.

How have CHWY and LULU total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CHWY delivered -20.96% and LULU delivered -23.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Chewy, Inc. (CHWY) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

A side-by-side comparison of Chewy, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CHWY

Chewy, Inc.

$9.87B

$23.84Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 8, 2026, 9:30 AM EDT

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$11.44B

$100.75Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 8, 2026, 9:30 AM EDT

Total return — CHWY vs LULU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

CHWY -32.4% (-5.4%/yr)LULU -42.4% (-7.6%/yr)CHWY compounded faster over this window

CHWY LULU

CHWY vs LULU: by the numbers

•LULU is the larger company ($11.44B vs $9.87B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.27 vs 51.43 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (12.78% vs 1.57% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.96% vs 10.72% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHWY	LULU
P/E ratio	51.43	8.27
Forward P/E	45.02	7.71
P/S ratio	0.79	1.02
P/B ratio	23.65	2.33
EV / EBITDA	28.17	5.12
FCF yield	5.82%	11.01%

Profitability

Metric	CHWY	LULU
Gross margin	29.72%	56.11%
Operating margin	1.72%	17.76%
Net margin	1.57%	12.78%
ROE	47.05%	29.14%
ROIC	20.11%	19.69%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHWY	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.72%	14.96%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	24.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	47.61%	-1.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-20.96%	-23.66%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHWY or LULU?: LULU has the lower trailing P/E: CHWY trades at 51.43 and LULU at 8.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CHWY or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — CHWY at a 10.72% CAGR versus LULU at 14.96%.
Is CHWY or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — CHWY at 1.57% versus LULU at 12.78%.
How have CHWY and LULU total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CHWY delivered -20.96% and LULU delivered -23.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHWY analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Chewy P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Chewy ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Chewy operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Chewy revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Chewy free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Chewy & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 8, 2026.