Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) vs Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU)
CHTR leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Charter Communications, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CHTR
Charter Communications, Inc.
$145.82Communication Services
PRU
Prudential Financial, Inc.
$108.50Financial Services
Total return — CHTR vs PRU
growth of $100 · last 16yCHTR +316.6%PRU +105.5%CHTR compounded faster
CHTR PRU
CHTR vs PRU: by the numbers
- •PRU is the larger company ($37.68B vs $20.59B market cap).
- •CHTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.94 vs 11.08 P/E).
- •CHTR converts more revenue to profit (9.03% vs 5.51% net margin).
- •CHTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (2.25% vs 0.80% CAGR).
- •PRU pays a dividend (5.07% yield) while CHTR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CHTR or PRU?
Metric tally: CHTR 12 · PRU 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCHTR(lower P/E)
GrowthCHTR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCHTR(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CHTR | PRU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 3.94● | 11.08 |
| Forward P/E | 3.23● | 7.90 |
| P/S ratio | 0.34● | 0.60 |
| P/B ratio | 1.13● | 1.19 |
| PEG ratio | 1.47 | 0.32● |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.59● | 8.53 |
| FCF yield | 21.79% | 25.84%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CHTR | PRU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 43.26%● | 32.90% |
| Operating margin | 24.11%● | 7.10% |
| Net margin | 9.03%● | 5.51% |
| ROE | 30.11%● | 10.84% |
| ROIC | 7.23%● | 0.68% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHTR | PRU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 5.07% |
| Payout ratio | — | 54.13% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHTR | PRU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.25%● | 0.80% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.42%● | -0.11% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -10.92% | 3.03%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -26.64% | 5.57%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHTR or PRU?
- It depends on your goal. value: CHTR (lower P/E); growth: CHTR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CHTR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CHTR leads 12 to 4.
- Is CHTR or PRU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CHTR is cheaper: CHTR trades at a 3.94 P/E and PRU at 11.08.
- Which has grown faster, CHTR or PRU?
- Over the past five years, CHTR grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 2.25% CAGR versus PRU at 0.80%.
- Does CHTR or PRU pay a bigger dividend?
- PRU pays a dividend (5.07% yield) while CHTR does not currently pay one.
- Is CHTR or PRU more profitable?
- CHTR runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.03% versus PRU at 5.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHTR or PRU?
- Over the past 10-year, PRU delivered the higher annualized total return — CHTR at -4.18% versus PRU at 8.78%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Charter Communications P/E ratioPrudential Financial P/E ratioCharter Communications dividend yieldPrudential Financial dividend yieldCharter Communications ROEPrudential Financial ROECharter Communications operating marginPrudential Financial operating marginCharter Communications revenue growthPrudential Financial revenue growthCharter Communications free cash flowPrudential Financial free cash flow
Charter Communications & Prudential Financial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.