Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHTR or NA?

NA has the lower trailing P/E: CHTR trades at 3.42 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CHTR or NA?

Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 1.71% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.

Is CHTR or NA more profitable?

NA runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.05% versus NA at 505.49%.

Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) vs Nano Labs Ltd (NA)

A side-by-side comparison of Charter Communications, Inc. and Nano Labs Ltd across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CHTR is classified in Communication Services; NA is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CHTR

Charter Communications, Inc.

$18.86B

$139.97Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Nano Labs Ltd

$119M

$1.76TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CHTR vs NA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

CHTR -72.4%NA -98.4%CHTR compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CHTR NA

CHTR vs NA: by the numbers

•CHTR is the larger company ($18.86B vs $119M market cap).
•NA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (2.30 vs 3.42 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NA converts more revenue to profit (505.49% vs 9.05% net margin).
•NA grew revenue faster over the past five years (64.16% vs 1.71% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHTR	NA
P/E ratio	3.42	2.30
Forward P/E	3.23	N/A
P/S ratio	0.29	11.40
P/B ratio	0.94	0.41
PEG ratio	1.47	N/A
EV / EBITDA	5.38	6.44
FCF yield	27.32%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	CHTR	NA
Gross margin	46.32%	-147.33%
Operating margin	23.67%	-396.84%
Net margin	9.05%	505.49%
ROE	29.05%	17.96%
ROIC	7.23%	-10.96%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHTR	NA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.71%	64.16%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.42%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-10.01%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-28.03%	N/A

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHTR or NA?: NA has the lower trailing P/E: CHTR trades at 3.42 and NA at 2.30. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CHTR or NA?: Over the past five years, NA grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 1.71% CAGR versus NA at 64.16%.
Is CHTR or NA more profitable?: NA runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.05% versus NA at 505.49%.

Go deeper

Full CHTR analysis Full NA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Charter Communications P/E ratio Nano Labs P/E ratio Charter Communications dividend yield Nano Labs dividend yield Charter Communications ROE Nano Labs ROE Charter Communications operating margin Nano Labs operating margin Charter Communications revenue growth Nano Labs revenue growth Charter Communications free cash flow Nano Labs free cash flow

Charter Communications & Nano Labs appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.