Is CHTR or LULU cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CHTR is cheaper: CHTR trades at a 3.94 P/E and LULU at 9.62.

Which has grown faster, CHTR or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 2.25% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.

Is CHTR or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.03% versus LULU at 13.03%.

Which has been the better investment, CHTR or LULU?

Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — CHTR at -4.18% versus LULU at 5.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

LULU leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though CHTR is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Charter Communications, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CHTR

Charter Communications, Inc.

$20.59B

$145.82Communication Services

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.49B

$118.77Consumer Cyclical

Total return — CHTR vs LULU

growth of $100 · last 16y

CHTR +316.6%LULU +646.3%LULU compounded faster

CHTR LULU

CHTR vs LULU: by the numbers

•CHTR is the larger company ($20.59B vs $13.49B market cap).
•CHTR trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.94 vs 9.62 P/E).
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 9.03% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 2.25% CAGR).

Which is better, CHTR or LULU?

Metric tally: CHTR 7 · LULU 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCHTR(lower P/E)

GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	CHTR	LULU
P/E ratio	3.94●	9.62
Forward P/E	3.23●	10.67
P/S ratio	0.34●	1.22
P/B ratio	1.13●	2.84
PEG ratio	1.47	0.40●
EV / EBITDA	5.59●	5.81
FCF yield	21.79%●	9.33%

Profitability

Metric	CHTR	LULU
Gross margin	43.26%	55.70%●
Operating margin	24.11%●	18.21%
Net margin	9.03%	13.03%●
ROE	30.11%	30.25%
ROIC	7.23%	22.70%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHTR	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.25%	17.61%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.42%	24.02%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-10.92%	7.36%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-26.64%	-18.88%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CHTR or LULU?: It depends on your goal. value: CHTR (lower P/E); growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 8 to 7.
Is CHTR or LULU cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CHTR is cheaper: CHTR trades at a 3.94 P/E and LULU at 9.62.
Which has grown faster, CHTR or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 2.25% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
Is CHTR or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.03% versus LULU at 13.03%.
Which has been the better investment, CHTR or LULU?: Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — CHTR at -4.18% versus LULU at 5.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHTR analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Charter Communications P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Charter Communications dividend yield Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Charter Communications ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Charter Communications operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Charter Communications revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Charter Communications free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Charter Communications & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.