Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHTR or LULU?

CHTR has the lower trailing P/E: CHTR trades at 3.51 and LULU at 7.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CHTR or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 1.71% CAGR versus LULU at 14.96%.

Is CHTR or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.05% versus LULU at 12.78%.

How have CHTR and LULU total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CHTR delivered -5.77% and LULU delivered 4.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

A side-by-side comparison of Charter Communications, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CHTR is classified in Communication Services; LULU is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CHTR

Charter Communications, Inc.

$18.19B

$135.00Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$10.90B

$95.98Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CHTR vs LULU

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CHTR -45.3% (-5.9%/yr)LULU +49.6% (+4.1%/yr)LULU compounded faster over this window

CHTR LULU

CHTR vs LULU: by the numbers

•CHTR is the larger company ($18.19B vs $10.90B market cap).
•CHTR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (3.51 vs 7.89 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (12.78% vs 9.05% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.96% vs 1.71% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHTR	LULU
P/E ratio	3.51	7.89
Forward P/E	3.28	9.90
P/S ratio	0.33	0.98
P/B ratio	1.07	2.27
EV / EBITDA	5.54	4.64
FCF yield	23.95%	12.43%

Profitability

Metric	CHTR	LULU
Gross margin	46.32%	56.11%
Operating margin	23.67%	17.76%
Net margin	9.05%	12.78%
ROE	29.05%	29.60%
ROIC	6.83%	20.81%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHTR	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.71%	14.96%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.42%	24.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-10.01%	-1.88%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-28.62%	-25.29%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHTR or LULU?: CHTR has the lower trailing P/E: CHTR trades at 3.51 and LULU at 7.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CHTR or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 1.71% CAGR versus LULU at 14.96%.
Is CHTR or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.05% versus LULU at 12.78%.
How have CHTR and LULU total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CHTR delivered -5.77% and LULU delivered 4.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHTR analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Charter Communications P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Charter Communications ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Charter Communications operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Charter Communications revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Charter Communications free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Charter Communications & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.