Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHTR or EG?

CHTR has the lower trailing P/E: CHTR trades at 3.51 and EG at 8.05. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CHTR or EG?

Over the past five years, EG grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 1.71% CAGR versus EG at 8.34%.

Does CHTR or EG pay a bigger dividend?

EG pays a dividend (2.15% yield), while CHTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CHTR or EG more profitable?

EG runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.05% versus EG at 11.45%.

How have CHTR and EG total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CHTR delivered -5.77% and EG delivered 9.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) vs Everest Group, Ltd. (EG)

A side-by-side comparison of Charter Communications, Inc. and Everest Group, Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CHTR is classified in Communication Services; EG is classified in Financial Services. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CHTR

Charter Communications, Inc.

$18.19B

$135.00Communication ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Everest Group, Ltd.

$14.95B

$377.77Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 16, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CHTR vs EG

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CHTR -45.3% (-5.9%/yr)EG +141.5% (+9.2%/yr)EG compounded faster over this window

CHTR EG

CHTR vs EG: by the numbers

•CHTR is the larger company ($18.19B vs $14.95B market cap).
•CHTR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (3.51 vs 8.05 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•EG converts more revenue to profit (11.45% vs 9.05% net margin).
•EG grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.34% vs 1.71% CAGR).
•EG pays a dividend (2.15% yield), while CHTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHTR	EG
P/E ratio	3.51	8.05
Forward P/E	3.28	7.06
P/S ratio	0.33	0.89
P/B ratio	1.07	0.97
EV / EBITDA	5.54	N/A
FCF yield	23.95%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	CHTR	EG
Gross margin	46.32%	20.52%
Operating margin	23.67%	15.38%
Net margin	9.05%	11.45%
ROE	29.05%	12.40%
ROIC	6.83%	N/A

Dividends

Metric	CHTR	EG
Dividend yield	N/A	2.15%
Payout ratio	N/A	17.04%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHTR	EG
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	1.71%	8.34%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.42%	24.21%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-10.01%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-28.62%	10.15%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHTR or EG?: CHTR has the lower trailing P/E: CHTR trades at 3.51 and EG at 8.05. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CHTR or EG?: Over the past five years, EG grew revenue faster — CHTR at a 1.71% CAGR versus EG at 8.34%.
Does CHTR or EG pay a bigger dividend?: EG pays a dividend (2.15% yield), while CHTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CHTR or EG more profitable?: EG runs the higher net margin — CHTR at 9.05% versus EG at 11.45%.
How have CHTR and EG total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CHTR delivered -5.77% and EG delivered 9.44% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHTR analysis Full EG analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Charter Communications P/E ratio Everest P/E ratio Everest dividend yield Charter Communications ROE Everest ROE Charter Communications operating margin Everest operating margin Charter Communications revenue growth Everest revenue growth Charter Communications free cash flow

Charter Communications & Everest appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.