C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
$153.60IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SWK
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
$103.27IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CHRW vs SWK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 29yCHRW +4461.2%SWK +412.9%CHRW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CHRW SWK
CHRW vs SWK: by the numbers
- •CHRW is the larger company ($18.11B vs $15.60B market cap).
- •SWK trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (25.31 vs 29.31 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •SWK converts more revenue to profit (4.07% vs 3.73% net margin).
- •CHRW grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.03% vs -0.16% CAGR).
- •SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.21% vs 1.63%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 29.31 | 25.31 |
| Forward P/E | 24.70 | 22.71 |
| P/S ratio | 1.08 | 1.03 |
| P/B ratio | 11.30 | 1.76 |
| PEG ratio | 1.29 | 0.82 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.66 | 11.44 |
| FCF yield | 3.64% | 8.19% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 10.13% | 31.72% |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | 8.34% |
| Net margin | 3.73% | 4.07% |
| ROE | 38.91% | 6.93% |
| ROIC | 19.58% | 6.41% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.63% | 3.21% |
| Payout ratio | 51.43% | 125.28% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | SWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.03% | -0.16% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | -19.52% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 89.56% | 0.62% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.92% | -8.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHRW or SWK?
- SWK has the lower trailing P/E: CHRW trades at 29.31 and SWK at 25.31. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or SWK?
- Over the past five years, CHRW grew revenue faster — CHRW at a 0.03% CAGR versus SWK at -0.16%.
- Does CHRW or SWK pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW yields 1.63% and SWK yields 3.21% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHRW or SWK more profitable?
- SWK runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.73% versus SWK at 4.07%.
- How have CHRW and SWK total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHRW delivered 10.83% and SWK delivered 0.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioStanley Black & Decker P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldStanley Black & Decker dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROEStanley Black & Decker ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginStanley Black & Decker operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthStanley Black & Decker revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowStanley Black & Decker free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 6, 2026.