C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)
CHRW leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 2, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
$189.85Industrials
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
$700.75Industrials
Total return — CHRW vs STRL
growth of $100 · last 29yCHRW +3272.1%STRL +61988.0%STRL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CHRW STRL
CHRW vs STRL: by the numbers
- •CHRW is the larger company ($22.38B vs $21.50B market cap).
- •CHRW trades at the lower earnings multiple (38.43 vs 69.46 P/E).
- •STRL converts more revenue to profit (12.02% vs 3.70% net margin).
- •STRL grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.81% vs -1.20% CAGR).
- •CHRW pays a dividend (1.33% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CHRW or STRL?
Metric tally: CHRW 9 · STRL 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCHRW(lower P/E)
GrowthSTRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCHRW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 38.43● | 69.46 |
| Forward P/E | 30.85● | 32.28 |
| P/S ratio | 1.42● | 8.36 |
| P/B ratio | 13.48● | 20.26 |
| PEG ratio | 1.29● | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.30● | 41.21 |
| FCF yield | 3.73%● | 1.83% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 8.29% | 23.29%● |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | 17.25%● |
| Net margin | 3.70% | 12.02%● |
| ROE | 35.15%● | 29.14% |
| ROIC | 19.58%● | 19.06% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.33% | — |
| Payout ratio | 51.64% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -1.20% | 14.81%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | 44.28%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.97% | 31.85%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.81% | 96.72%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHRW or STRL?
- It depends on your goal. value: CHRW (lower P/E); growth: STRL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CHRW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CHRW leads 9 to 7.
- Is CHRW or STRL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CHRW is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 38.43 P/E and STRL at 69.46.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or STRL?
- Over the past five years, STRL grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.
- Does CHRW or STRL pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW pays a dividend (1.33% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
- Is CHRW or STRL more profitable?
- STRL runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus STRL at 12.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHRW or STRL?
- Over the past 10-year, STRL delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.27% versus STRL at 63.67%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioSterling Infrastructure P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldSterling Infrastructure dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROESterling Infrastructure ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginSterling Infrastructure operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthSterling Infrastructure revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowSterling Infrastructure free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 2, 2026.