C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 16, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
$148.57IndustrialsAt close: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
$576.48IndustrialsAt close: Aug 14, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — CHRW vs STRL
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCHRW +171.1% (+10.5%/yr)STRL +8768.9% (+56.6%/yr)STRL compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CHRW STRL
CHRW vs STRL: by the numbers
- •STRL is the larger company ($17.69B vs $17.51B market cap).
- •CHRW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.35 vs 41.56 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •STRL converts more revenue to profit (12.55% vs 3.73% net margin).
- •STRL grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.89% vs 0.03% CAGR).
- •CHRW pays a dividend (1.69% yield), while STRL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.35 | 41.56 |
| Forward P/E | 23.90 | 29.58 |
| P/S ratio | 1.05 | 5.22 |
| P/B ratio | 10.93 | 13.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.01 | 24.95 |
| FCF yield | 3.76% | 2.68% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 10.13% | 23.59% |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | 18.06% |
| Net margin | 3.73% | 12.55% |
| ROE | 38.91% | 31.79% |
| ROIC | 19.58% | 19.06% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.69% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 51.43% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.03% | 18.89% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | 44.28% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 89.56% | 32.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.62% | 90.18% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHRW or STRL?
- CHRW has the lower trailing P/E: CHRW trades at 28.35 and STRL at 41.56. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or STRL?
- Over the past five years, STRL grew revenue faster — CHRW at a 0.03% CAGR versus STRL at 18.89%.
- Does CHRW or STRL pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW pays a dividend (1.69% yield), while STRL is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is CHRW or STRL more profitable?
- STRL runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.73% versus STRL at 12.55%.
- How have CHRW and STRL total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHRW delivered 10.38% and STRL delivered 57.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioSterling Infrastructure P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROESterling Infrastructure ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginSterling Infrastructure operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthSterling Infrastructure revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowSterling Infrastructure free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 16, 2026.