Is CHRW or SNA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 36.51 P/E and SNA at 20.71.

Which has grown faster, CHRW or SNA?

Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus SNA at 5.87%.

Does CHRW or SNA pay a bigger dividend?

CHRW yields 1.39% and SNA yields 2.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CHRW or SNA more profitable?

SNA runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus SNA at 19.99%.

Which has been the better investment, CHRW or SNA?

Over the past 10-year, SNA delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.23% versus SNA at 13.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)

SNA leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CHRW

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

Total return — CHRW vs SNA

growth of $100 · last 29y

CHRW +3103.2%SNA +820.5%CHRW compounded faster

CHRW SNA

CHRW vs SNA: by the numbers

•CHRW is the larger company ($21.26B vs $20.77B market cap).
•SNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.71 vs 36.51 P/E).
•SNA converts more revenue to profit (19.99% vs 3.70% net margin).
•SNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.87% vs -1.20% CAGR).
•SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.36% vs 1.39%).

Which is better, CHRW or SNA?

Metric tally: CHRW 6 · SNA 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSNA(lower P/E)

GrowthSNA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSNA(higher dividend yield)

QualityCHRW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHRW	SNA
P/E ratio	36.51	20.71●
Forward P/E	24.51	20.98●
P/S ratio	1.35●	4.13
P/B ratio	12.81	3.55●
PEG ratio	1.29●	1.87
EV / EBITDA	23.95	13.82●
FCF yield	3.93%	5.10%●

Profitability

Metric	CHRW	SNA
Gross margin	8.29%	51.30%●
Operating margin	4.90%	24.71%●
Net margin	3.70%	19.99%●
ROE	35.15%●	17.18%
ROIC	19.58%●	13.79%

Dividends

Metric	CHRW	SNA
Dividend yield	1.39%	2.36%●
Payout ratio	51.43%	48.46%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHRW	SNA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.20%	5.87%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.47%	11.05%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.97%●	0.58%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.12%●	15.53%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CHRW or SNA?: It depends on your goal. value: SNA (lower P/E); growth: SNA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SNA (higher dividend yield); quality: CHRW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SNA leads 11 to 6.
Is CHRW or SNA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 36.51 P/E and SNA at 20.71.
Which has grown faster, CHRW or SNA?: Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus SNA at 5.87%.
Does CHRW or SNA pay a bigger dividend?: CHRW yields 1.39% and SNA yields 2.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CHRW or SNA more profitable?: SNA runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus SNA at 19.99%.
Which has been the better investment, CHRW or SNA?: Over the past 10-year, SNA delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.23% versus SNA at 13.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHRW analysis Full SNA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratio Snap-on P/E ratio C.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yield Snap-on dividend yield C.H. Robinson Worldwide ROE Snap-on ROE C.H. Robinson Worldwide operating margin Snap-on operating margin C.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growth Snap-on revenue growth C.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flow Snap-on free cash flow

C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Snap-on appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.