C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
$157.72IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
$368.90IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CHRW vs SNA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCHRW +181.9% (+10.9%/yr)SNA +212.4% (+12.1%/yr)SNA compounded faster over this window
CHRW SNA
CHRW vs SNA: by the numbers
- •SNA is the larger company ($19.08B vs $18.59B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.82 vs 30.10 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (20.37% vs 3.73% net margin).
- •SNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.42% vs 0.03% CAGR).
- •SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.65% vs 1.60%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 30.10 | 18.82 |
| Forward P/E | 25.25 | 18.63 |
| PEG ratio | 5.62 | 1.73 |
| P/S ratio | 1.09 | 3.76 |
| P/B ratio | 11.42 | 3.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 21.87 | 14.32 |
| FCF yield | 3.60% | 5.49% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 10.13% | 51.21% |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | 23.78% |
| Net margin | 3.73% | 20.37% |
| ROE | 38.91% | 17.11% |
| ROIC | 18.93% | 12.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.60% | 2.65% |
| Payout ratio | 48.09% | 49.80% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.03% | 5.42% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | 11.06% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 89.56% | 0.01% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.37% | 14.94% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHRW or SNA?
- SNA has the lower trailing P/E: CHRW trades at 30.10 and SNA at 18.82. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or SNA?
- Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — CHRW at a 0.03% CAGR versus SNA at 5.42%.
- Does CHRW or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW yields 1.60% and SNA yields 2.65% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHRW or SNA more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.73% versus SNA at 20.37%.
- How have CHRW and SNA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHRW delivered 10.90% and SNA delivered 11.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioSnap-on P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldSnap-on dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROESnap-on ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginSnap-on operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthSnap-on revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowSnap-on free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Snap-on appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.