C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)

A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnCHRW vs SNA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
CHRW +162.3% (+10.1%/yr)SNA +232.4% (+12.8%/yr)SNA compounded faster over this window
100200300Start $10020182020202220242026$262$332
CHRW SNA

CHRW vs SNA: by the numbers

  • SNA is the larger company ($20.38B vs $17.04B market cap).
  • SNA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.10 vs 27.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • SNA converts more revenue to profit (20.37% vs 3.73% net margin).
  • SNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.42% vs 0.03% CAGR).
  • SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.48% vs 1.74%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCHRWSNA
P/E ratio27.5820.10
Forward P/E23.2420.61
P/S ratio1.024.08
P/B ratio10.633.43
EV / EBITDA20.4915.58
FCF yield3.86%5.05%

Profitability

MetricCHRWSNA
Gross margin10.13%51.21%
Operating margin4.90%23.78%
Net margin3.73%20.37%
ROE38.91%17.11%
ROIC18.93%12.35%

Dividends

MetricCHRWSNA
Dividend yield1.74%2.48%
Payout ratio51.43%50.00%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCHRWSNA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)0.03%5.42%
EPS CAGR (5Y)5.47%11.06%
FCF CAGR (5Y)89.56%0.01%
Total return CAGR (5Y)13.05%15.71%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHRW or SNA?
SNA has the lower trailing P/E: CHRW trades at 27.58 and SNA at 20.10. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CHRW or SNA?
Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — CHRW at a 0.03% CAGR versus SNA at 5.42%.
Does CHRW or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
CHRW yields 1.74% and SNA yields 2.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CHRW or SNA more profitable?
SNA runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.73% versus SNA at 20.37%.
How have CHRW and SNA total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, CHRW delivered 10.12% and SNA delivered 12.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.