C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)
A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 20, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHRW
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.
$144.52IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SNA
Snap-on Incorporated
$393.93IndustrialsAt close: Aug 19, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — CHRW vs SNA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCHRW +162.3% (+10.1%/yr)SNA +232.4% (+12.8%/yr)SNA compounded faster over this window
CHRW SNA
CHRW vs SNA: by the numbers
- •SNA is the larger company ($20.38B vs $17.04B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.10 vs 27.58 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (20.37% vs 3.73% net margin).
- •SNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.42% vs 0.03% CAGR).
- •SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.48% vs 1.74%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHRW | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 27.58 | 20.10 |
| Forward P/E | 23.24 | 20.61 |
| P/S ratio | 1.02 | 4.08 |
| P/B ratio | 10.63 | 3.43 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.49 | 15.58 |
| FCF yield | 3.86% | 5.05% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHRW | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 10.13% | 51.21% |
| Operating margin | 4.90% | 23.78% |
| Net margin | 3.73% | 20.37% |
| ROE | 38.91% | 17.11% |
| ROIC | 18.93% | 12.35% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHRW | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.74% | 2.48% |
| Payout ratio | 51.43% | 50.00% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHRW | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.03% | 5.42% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | 11.06% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 89.56% | 0.01% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.05% | 15.71% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHRW or SNA?
- SNA has the lower trailing P/E: CHRW trades at 27.58 and SNA at 20.10. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHRW or SNA?
- Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — CHRW at a 0.03% CAGR versus SNA at 5.42%.
- Does CHRW or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
- CHRW yields 1.74% and SNA yields 2.48% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHRW or SNA more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.73% versus SNA at 20.37%.
- How have CHRW and SNA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHRW delivered 10.12% and SNA delivered 12.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratioSnap-on P/E ratioC.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yieldSnap-on dividend yieldC.H. Robinson Worldwide ROESnap-on ROEC.H. Robinson Worldwide operating marginSnap-on operating marginC.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growthSnap-on revenue growthC.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flowSnap-on free cash flow
C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Snap-on appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 20, 2026.