Is CHRW or RBC cheaper?

On trailing earnings, CHRW is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 36.51 P/E and RBC at 71.39.

Which has grown faster, CHRW or RBC?

Over the past five years, RBC grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus RBC at 22.93%.

Does CHRW or RBC pay a bigger dividend?

CHRW pays a dividend (1.39% yield) while RBC does not currently pay one.

Is CHRW or RBC more profitable?

RBC runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus RBC at 15.37%.

Which has been the better investment, CHRW or RBC?

Over the past 10-year, RBC delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.23% versus RBC at 28.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC)

CHRW leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and RBC Bearings Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CHRW

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

$21.26B

$180.34Industrials

RBC

RBC Bearings Incorporated

$20.53B

$648.89Industrials

Total return — CHRW vs RBC

growth of $100 · last 21y

CHRW +511.3%RBC +2038.0%RBC compounded faster

CHRW RBC

CHRW vs RBC: by the numbers

•CHRW is the larger company ($21.26B vs $20.53B market cap).
•CHRW trades at the lower earnings multiple (36.51 vs 71.39 P/E).
•RBC converts more revenue to profit (15.37% vs 3.70% net margin).
•RBC grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.93% vs -1.20% CAGR).
•CHRW pays a dividend (1.39% yield) while RBC does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CHRW or RBC?

Metric tally: CHRW 9 · RBC 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueCHRW(lower P/E)

GrowthRBC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCHRW(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHRW	RBC
P/E ratio	36.51●	71.39
Forward P/E	24.51●	53.30
P/S ratio	1.35●	11.00
P/B ratio	12.81	6.12●
PEG ratio	1.29●	3.27
EV / EBITDA	23.95●	39.57
FCF yield	3.93%●	1.67%

Profitability

Metric	CHRW	RBC
Gross margin	8.29%	44.37%●
Operating margin	4.90%	22.50%●
Net margin	3.70%	15.37%●
ROE	35.15%●	8.56%
ROIC	19.58%●	6.88%

Dividends

Metric	CHRW	RBC
Dividend yield	1.39%	—
Payout ratio	51.43%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHRW	RBC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.20%	22.93%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.47%	10.16%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.97%●	19.21%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	16.12%	37.52%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, CHRW or RBC?: It depends on your goal. value: CHRW (lower P/E); growth: RBC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CHRW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CHRW leads 9 to 7.
Is CHRW or RBC cheaper?: On trailing earnings, CHRW is cheaper: CHRW trades at a 36.51 P/E and RBC at 71.39.
Which has grown faster, CHRW or RBC?: Over the past five years, RBC grew revenue faster — CHRW at a -1.20% CAGR versus RBC at 22.93%.
Does CHRW or RBC pay a bigger dividend?: CHRW pays a dividend (1.39% yield) while RBC does not currently pay one.
Is CHRW or RBC more profitable?: RBC runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.70% versus RBC at 15.37%.
Which has been the better investment, CHRW or RBC?: Over the past 10-year, RBC delivered the higher annualized total return — CHRW at 12.23% versus RBC at 28.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHRW analysis Full RBC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratio RBC Bearings P/E ratio C.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yield RBC Bearings dividend yield C.H. Robinson Worldwide ROE RBC Bearings ROE C.H. Robinson Worldwide operating margin RBC Bearings operating margin C.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growth RBC Bearings revenue growth C.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flow RBC Bearings free cash flow

C.H. Robinson Worldwide & RBC Bearings appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.