Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHRW or NDSN?

CHRW has the lower trailing P/E: CHRW trades at 29.16 and NDSN at 31.80. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CHRW or NDSN?

Over the past five years, NDSN grew revenue faster — CHRW at a 0.03% CAGR versus NDSN at 5.12%.

Does CHRW or NDSN pay a bigger dividend?

CHRW yields 1.65% and NDSN yields 1.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CHRW or NDSN more profitable?

NDSN runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.73% versus NDSN at 18.63%.

How have CHRW and NDSN total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CHRW delivered 10.79% and NDSN delivered 13.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs Nordson Corporation (NDSN)

A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and Nordson Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CHRW

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

$18.01B

$152.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

NDSN

Nordson Corporation

$17.52B

$314.47IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CHRW vs NDSN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CHRW +185.2% (+11.0%/yr)NDSN +249.5% (+13.3%/yr)NDSN compounded faster over this window

CHRW NDSN

CHRW vs NDSN: by the numbers

•CHRW is the larger company ($18.01B vs $17.52B market cap).
•CHRW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.16 vs 31.80 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•NDSN converts more revenue to profit (18.63% vs 3.73% net margin).
•NDSN grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.12% vs 0.03% CAGR).
•CHRW pays the higher dividend yield (1.65% vs 1.08%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHRW	NDSN
P/E ratio	29.16	31.80
Forward P/E	24.52	26.44
P/S ratio	1.06	5.88
P/B ratio	11.06	5.36
EV / EBITDA	21.24	20.27
FCF yield	3.71%	4.16%

Profitability

Metric	CHRW	NDSN
Gross margin	10.13%	55.29%
Operating margin	4.90%	26.88%
Net margin	3.73%	18.63%
ROE	38.91%	16.98%
ROIC	18.93%	12.16%

Dividends

Metric	CHRW	NDSN
Dividend yield	1.65%	1.08%
Payout ratio	48.09%	34.38%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHRW	NDSN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.03%	5.12%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.47%	14.66%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	89.56%	6.76%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	14.11%	6.70%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHRW or NDSN?: CHRW has the lower trailing P/E: CHRW trades at 29.16 and NDSN at 31.80. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CHRW or NDSN?: Over the past five years, NDSN grew revenue faster — CHRW at a 0.03% CAGR versus NDSN at 5.12%.
Does CHRW or NDSN pay a bigger dividend?: CHRW yields 1.65% and NDSN yields 1.08% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CHRW or NDSN more profitable?: NDSN runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.73% versus NDSN at 18.63%.
How have CHRW and NDSN total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CHRW delivered 10.79% and NDSN delivered 13.80% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHRW analysis Full NDSN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratio Nordson P/E ratio C.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yield Nordson dividend yield C.H. Robinson Worldwide ROE Nordson ROE C.H. Robinson Worldwide operating margin Nordson operating margin C.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growth Nordson revenue growth C.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flow Nordson free cash flow

C.H. Robinson Worldwide & Nordson appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.