Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHRW or MTZ?

CHRW has the lower trailing P/E: CHRW trades at 28.70 and MTZ at 38.44. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CHRW or MTZ?

Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — CHRW at a 0.03% CAGR versus MTZ at 17.90%.

Does CHRW or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?

CHRW pays a dividend (1.67% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is CHRW or MTZ more profitable?

CHRW runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.73% versus MTZ at 3.12%.

How have CHRW and MTZ total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CHRW delivered 10.66% and MTZ delivered 23.14% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) vs MasTec, Inc. (MTZ)

A side-by-side comparison of C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and MasTec, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CHRW

C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

$17.64B

$149.66IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MTZ

MasTec, Inc.

$19.26B

$239.78IndustrialsDelayed quote: Aug 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CHRW vs MTZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CHRW +164.0% (+10.2%/yr)MTZ +702.3% (+23.1%/yr)MTZ compounded faster over this window

CHRW MTZ

CHRW vs MTZ: by the numbers

•MTZ is the larger company ($19.26B vs $17.64B market cap).
•CHRW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.70 vs 38.44 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CHRW converts more revenue to profit (3.73% vs 3.12% net margin).
•MTZ grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.90% vs 0.03% CAGR).
•CHRW pays a dividend (1.67% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHRW	MTZ
P/E ratio	28.70	38.44
Forward P/E	24.13	25.80
P/S ratio	1.06	1.18
P/B ratio	11.06	5.47
EV / EBITDA	21.24	15.73
FCF yield	3.71%	1.29%

Profitability

Metric	CHRW	MTZ
Gross margin	10.13%	11.47%
Operating margin	4.90%	5.79%
Net margin	3.73%	3.12%
ROE	38.91%	14.47%
ROIC	18.93%	10.64%

Dividends

Metric	CHRW	MTZ
Dividend yield	1.67%	N/A
Payout ratio	51.43%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHRW	MTZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	0.03%	17.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.47%	2.94%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	89.56%	-16.75%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	13.19%	20.90%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHRW or MTZ?: CHRW has the lower trailing P/E: CHRW trades at 28.70 and MTZ at 38.44. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CHRW or MTZ?: Over the past five years, MTZ grew revenue faster — CHRW at a 0.03% CAGR versus MTZ at 17.90%.
Does CHRW or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?: CHRW pays a dividend (1.67% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CHRW or MTZ more profitable?: CHRW runs the higher net margin — CHRW at 3.73% versus MTZ at 3.12%.
How have CHRW and MTZ total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CHRW delivered 10.66% and MTZ delivered 23.14% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHRW analysis Full MTZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

C.H. Robinson Worldwide P/E ratio MasTec P/E ratio C.H. Robinson Worldwide dividend yield C.H. Robinson Worldwide ROE MasTec ROE C.H. Robinson Worldwide operating margin MasTec operating margin C.H. Robinson Worldwide revenue growth MasTec revenue growth C.H. Robinson Worldwide free cash flow MasTec free cash flow

C.H. Robinson Worldwide & MasTec appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 31, 2026.