Coherus Oncology, Inc. (CHRS) vs Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM)

A side-by-side comparison of Coherus Oncology, Inc. and Neuronetics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CHRS vs STIM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y
CHRS -92.3% (-27.4%/yr)STIM -92.1% (-27.2%/yr)STIM compounded faster over this window
050100150Start $1002020202220242026$8$8
CHRS STIM

CHRS vs STIM: by the numbers

  • •CHRS is the larger company ($159M vs $155M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; STIM's is the smaller (-19.62% vs -257.10% net margin).
  • •STIM grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.26% vs -33.60% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCHRSSTIM
P/S ratio3.121.00
P/B ratio2.628.69

Profitability

MetricCHRSSTIM
Gross margin63.55%49.12%
Operating margin-425.72%-14.74%
Net margin-257.10%-19.62%
ROE-215.26%-170.49%
ROIC-135.38%-22.15%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCHRSSTIM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-33.60%23.26%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-41.38%-19.46%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CHRS or STIM?
Over the past five years, STIM grew revenue faster — CHRS at a -33.60% CAGR versus STIM at 23.26%.
How have CHRS and STIM total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, CHRS delivered -41.38% and STIM delivered -19.46% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.