Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHA)
A side-by-side comparison of Churchill Downs Incorporated and Rush Enterprises, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHDN
Churchill Downs Incorporated
$78.21Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
RUSHA
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
$47.05Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CHDN vs RUSHA
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCHDN +235.9% (+12.9%/yr)RUSHA +673.6% (+22.7%/yr)RUSHA compounded faster over this window
CHDN RUSHA
CHDN vs RUSHA: by the numbers
- •RUSHA is the larger company ($5.48B vs $5.45B market cap).
- •CHDN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.39 vs 14.17 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CHDN converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 3.67% net margin).
- •CHDN grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.51% vs 7.70% CAGR).
- •RUSHA pays the higher dividend yield (1.10% vs 0.56%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHDN | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.39 | 14.17 |
| Forward P/E | 11.23 | 19.08 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.37 |
| P/S ratio | 1.82 | 0.76 |
| P/B ratio | 4.07 | 2.35 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.45 | 12.48 |
| FCF yield | 7.02% | 2.29% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHDN | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.58% | 18.98% |
| Operating margin | 24.21% | 5.13% |
| Net margin | 13.69% | 3.67% |
| ROE | 30.55% | 11.38% |
| ROIC | 7.53% | 7.17% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHDN | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.10% |
| Payout ratio | 7.50% | 15.66% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHDN | RUSHA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.51% | 7.70% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 19.21% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 21.79% | -22.34% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.47% | 19.56% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHDN or RUSHA?
- CHDN has the lower trailing P/E: CHDN trades at 13.39 and RUSHA at 14.17. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHDN or RUSHA?
- Over the past five years, CHDN grew revenue faster — CHDN at a 15.51% CAGR versus RUSHA at 7.70%.
- Does CHDN or RUSHA pay a bigger dividend?
- CHDN yields 0.56% and RUSHA yields 1.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHDN or RUSHA more profitable?
- CHDN runs the higher net margin — CHDN at 13.69% versus RUSHA at 3.67%.
- How have CHDN and RUSHA total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHDN delivered 13.03% and RUSHA delivered 21.69% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Churchill Downs P/E ratioRush Enterprises P/E ratioChurchill Downs dividend yieldRush Enterprises dividend yieldChurchill Downs ROERush Enterprises ROEChurchill Downs operating marginRush Enterprises operating marginChurchill Downs revenue growthRush Enterprises revenue growthChurchill Downs free cash flowRush Enterprises free cash flow
Churchill Downs & Rush Enterprises appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.