Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) vs Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN)
A side-by-side comparison of Churchill Downs Incorporated and Vail Resorts, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHDN
Churchill Downs Incorporated
$78.54Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:45 PM EDT
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
$146.89Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:45 PM EDT
Total return — CHDN vs MTN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCHDN +235.9% (+12.9%/yr)MTN +21.3% (+2.0%/yr)CHDN compounded faster over this window
CHDN MTN
CHDN vs MTN: by the numbers
- •CHDN is the larger company ($5.47B vs $5.23B market cap).
- •CHDN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.45 vs 35.65 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CHDN converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 5.20% net margin).
- •CHDN grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.51% vs 8.25% CAGR).
- •MTN pays the higher dividend yield (6.37% vs 0.56%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHDN | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.45 | 35.65 |
| Forward P/E | 11.28 | 26.38 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 6.31 |
| P/S ratio | 1.83 | 1.84 |
| P/B ratio | 4.08 | 21.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.47 | 11.60 |
| FCF yield | 6.99% | 5.96% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHDN | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.58% | 41.75% |
| Operating margin | 24.21% | 14.82% |
| Net margin | 13.69% | 5.20% |
| ROE | 30.55% | 61.34% |
| ROIC | 7.53% | 7.01% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHDN | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 6.37% |
| Payout ratio | 7.50% | 215.53% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHDN | MTN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.51% | 8.25% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 5.43% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 21.79% | -5.32% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.47% | -12.89% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHDN or MTN?
- CHDN has the lower trailing P/E: CHDN trades at 13.45 and MTN at 35.65. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHDN or MTN?
- Over the past five years, CHDN grew revenue faster — CHDN at a 15.51% CAGR versus MTN at 8.25%.
- Does CHDN or MTN pay a bigger dividend?
- CHDN yields 0.56% and MTN yields 6.37% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHDN or MTN more profitable?
- CHDN runs the higher net margin — CHDN at 13.69% versus MTN at 5.20%.
- How have CHDN and MTN total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHDN delivered 13.03% and MTN delivered 1.93% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Churchill Downs P/E ratioVail Resorts P/E ratioChurchill Downs dividend yieldVail Resorts dividend yieldChurchill Downs ROEVail Resorts ROEChurchill Downs operating marginVail Resorts operating marginChurchill Downs revenue growthVail Resorts revenue growthChurchill Downs free cash flowVail Resorts free cash flow
Churchill Downs & Vail Resorts appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.