Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) vs Mattel, Inc. (MAT)
A side-by-side comparison of Churchill Downs Incorporated and Mattel, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHDN
Churchill Downs Incorporated
$78.21Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
$15.93Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CHDN vs MAT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCHDN +242.3% (+13.1%/yr)MAT -43.8% (-5.6%/yr)CHDN compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CHDN MAT
CHDN vs MAT: by the numbers
- •CHDN is the larger company ($5.45B vs $4.63B market cap).
- •MAT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.89 vs 13.39 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CHDN converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 7.78% net margin).
- •CHDN grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.51% vs 1.24% CAGR).
- •CHDN pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while MAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHDN | MAT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.39 | 11.89 |
| Forward P/E | 11.23 | 12.21 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 0.41 |
| P/S ratio | 1.82 | 0.84 |
| P/B ratio | 4.07 | 2.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.45 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 7.02% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | CHDN | MAT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.58% | 47.41% |
| Operating margin | 24.21% | 8.50% |
| Net margin | 13.69% | 7.78% |
| ROE | 30.55% | 21.39% |
| ROIC | 7.53% | 7.88% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHDN | MAT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 7.50% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHDN | MAT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.51% | 1.24% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 28.27% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 21.79% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.47% | -2.83% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHDN or MAT?
- MAT has the lower trailing P/E: CHDN trades at 13.39 and MAT at 11.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHDN or MAT?
- Over the past five years, CHDN grew revenue faster — CHDN at a 15.51% CAGR versus MAT at 1.24%.
- Does CHDN or MAT pay a bigger dividend?
- CHDN pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while MAT is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
- Is CHDN or MAT more profitable?
- CHDN runs the higher net margin — CHDN at 13.69% versus MAT at 7.78%.
- How have CHDN and MAT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHDN delivered 13.03% and MAT delivered -5.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Churchill Downs P/E ratioMattel P/E ratioChurchill Downs dividend yieldChurchill Downs ROEMattel ROEChurchill Downs operating marginMattel operating marginChurchill Downs revenue growthMattel revenue growthChurchill Downs free cash flowMattel free cash flow
Churchill Downs & Mattel appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.