Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) vs LKQ Corporation (LKQ)
A side-by-side comparison of Churchill Downs Incorporated and LKQ Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHDN
Churchill Downs Incorporated
$79.02Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:35 AM EDT
LKQ
LKQ Corporation
$22.68Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:31 AM EDT
Total return — CHDN vs LKQ
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCHDN +235.9% (+12.9%/yr)LKQ -22.4% (-2.5%/yr)CHDN compounded faster over this window
CHDN LKQ
CHDN vs LKQ: by the numbers
- •LKQ is the larger company ($5.74B vs $5.51B market cap).
- •LKQ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.60 vs 13.53 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CHDN converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 3.37% net margin).
- •CHDN grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.51% vs 1.66% CAGR).
- •LKQ pays the higher dividend yield (5.36% vs 0.56%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHDN | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.53 | 12.60 |
| Forward P/E | 11.35 | 8.45 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 5.32 |
| P/S ratio | 1.84 | 0.42 |
| P/B ratio | 4.11 | 0.89 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.51 | 8.13 |
| FCF yield | 6.95% | 10.89% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHDN | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.58% | 37.66% |
| Operating margin | 24.21% | 6.79% |
| Net margin | 13.69% | 3.37% |
| ROE | 30.55% | 7.15% |
| ROIC | 7.53% | 5.62% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHDN | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 5.36% |
| Payout ratio | 7.50% | 66.67% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHDN | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.51% | 1.66% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 2.28% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 21.79% | -13.37% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.47% | -12.79% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHDN or LKQ?
- LKQ has the lower trailing P/E: CHDN trades at 13.53 and LKQ at 12.60. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHDN or LKQ?
- Over the past five years, CHDN grew revenue faster — CHDN at a 15.51% CAGR versus LKQ at 1.66%.
- Does CHDN or LKQ pay a bigger dividend?
- CHDN yields 0.56% and LKQ yields 5.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHDN or LKQ more profitable?
- CHDN runs the higher net margin — CHDN at 13.69% versus LKQ at 3.37%.
- How have CHDN and LKQ total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHDN delivered 13.03% and LKQ delivered -2.62% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Churchill Downs P/E ratioLKQ P/E ratioChurchill Downs dividend yieldLKQ dividend yieldChurchill Downs ROELKQ ROEChurchill Downs operating marginLKQ operating marginChurchill Downs revenue growthLKQ revenue growthChurchill Downs free cash flowLKQ free cash flow
Churchill Downs & LKQ appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.