Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) vs Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX)
A side-by-side comparison of Churchill Downs Incorporated and Garrett Motion Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHDN
Churchill Downs Incorporated
$79.21Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:25 AM EDT
GTX
Garrett Motion Inc.
$26.12Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 11:25 AM EDT
Total return — CHDN vs GTX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8yCHDN +80.2% (+7.6%/yr)GTX +43.5% (+4.6%/yr)CHDN compounded faster over this window
CHDN GTX
CHDN vs GTX: by the numbers
- •CHDN is the larger company ($5.52B vs $4.87B market cap).
- •CHDN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (13.56 vs 14.27 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CHDN converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 9.51% net margin).
- •CHDN grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.51% vs 0.05% CAGR).
- •GTX pays the higher dividend yield (1.20% vs 0.56%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHDN | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.56 | 14.27 |
| Forward P/E | 11.37 | 13.18 |
| PEG ratio | N/A | 1.86 |
| P/S ratio | 1.85 | 1.30 |
| P/B ratio | 4.12 | N/A |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.52 | 12.21 |
| FCF yield | 6.93% | 7.49% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHDN | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.58% | 19.47% |
| Operating margin | 24.21% | 10.63% |
| Net margin | 13.69% | 9.51% |
| ROE | 30.55% | N/A |
| ROIC | 7.53% | 31.32% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHDN | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | 1.20% |
| Payout ratio | 7.50% | 17.49% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHDN | GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.51% | 0.05% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 7.90% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 21.79% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.47% | 29.98% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHDN or GTX?
- CHDN has the lower trailing P/E: CHDN trades at 13.56 and GTX at 14.27. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHDN or GTX?
- Over the past five years, CHDN grew revenue faster — CHDN at a 15.51% CAGR versus GTX at 0.05%.
- Does CHDN or GTX pay a bigger dividend?
- CHDN yields 0.56% and GTX yields 1.20% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHDN or GTX more profitable?
- CHDN runs the higher net margin — CHDN at 13.69% versus GTX at 9.51%.
- How have CHDN and GTX total returns compared?
- Over the past 5 years, CHDN delivered -8.47% and GTX delivered 29.98% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Churchill Downs P/E ratioGarrett Motion P/E ratioChurchill Downs dividend yieldGarrett Motion dividend yieldChurchill Downs ROEGarrett Motion ROEChurchill Downs operating marginGarrett Motion operating marginChurchill Downs revenue growthGarrett Motion revenue growthChurchill Downs free cash flowGarrett Motion free cash flow
Churchill Downs & Garrett Motion appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.