Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) vs Crocs, Inc. (CROX)
A side-by-side comparison of Churchill Downs Incorporated and Crocs, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHDN
Churchill Downs Incorporated
$78.21Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CROX
Crocs, Inc.
$120.22Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CHDN vs CROX
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCHDN +235.9% (+12.9%/yr)CROX +1342.9% (+30.6%/yr)CROX compounded faster over this window
CHDN CROX
CHDN vs CROX: by the numbers
- •CROX is the larger company ($5.76B vs $5.45B market cap).
- •CROX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.40 vs 13.39 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CROX converts more revenue to profit (14.63% vs 13.69% net margin).
- •CROX grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.69% vs 15.51% CAGR).
- •CHDN pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while CROX has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHDN | CROX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 13.39 | 10.40 |
| Forward P/E | 11.23 | 8.62 |
| P/S ratio | 1.82 | 1.42 |
| P/B ratio | 4.07 | 4.16 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.45 | 7.90 |
| FCF yield | 7.02% | 12.22% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHDN | CROX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 33.58% | 57.47% |
| Operating margin | 24.21% | 20.73% |
| Net margin | 13.69% | 14.63% |
| ROE | 30.55% | 42.86% |
| ROIC | 7.53% | 18.10% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHDN | CROX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.56% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 7.50% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHDN | CROX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.51% | 16.69% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 21.79% | 10.38% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -8.47% | -2.76% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHDN or CROX?
- CROX has the lower trailing P/E: CHDN trades at 13.39 and CROX at 10.40. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHDN or CROX?
- Over the past five years, CROX grew revenue faster — CHDN at a 15.51% CAGR versus CROX at 16.69%.
- Does CHDN or CROX pay a bigger dividend?
- CHDN pays a dividend (0.56% yield), while CROX has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CHDN or CROX more profitable?
- CROX runs the higher net margin — CHDN at 13.69% versus CROX at 14.63%.
- How have CHDN and CROX total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHDN delivered 13.03% and CROX delivered 30.23% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Churchill Downs P/E ratioCrocs P/E ratioChurchill Downs dividend yieldChurchill Downs ROECrocs ROEChurchill Downs operating marginCrocs operating marginChurchill Downs revenue growthCrocs revenue growthChurchill Downs free cash flowCrocs free cash flow
Churchill Downs & Crocs appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.