Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) vs Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ)
STZ leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Constellation Brands, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
$97.56Consumer Defensive
STZ
Constellation Brands, Inc.
$148.51Consumer Defensive
Total return — CHD vs STZ
growth of $100 · last 30yCHD +5672.8%STZ +3585.1%CHD compounded faster
CHD STZ
CHD vs STZ: by the numbers
- •STZ is the larger company ($25.47B vs $23.12B market cap).
- •STZ trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.49 vs 32.20 P/E).
- •STZ converts more revenue to profit (18.46% vs 11.81% net margin).
- •CHD grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.54% vs 1.19% CAGR).
- •STZ pays the higher dividend yield (2.75% vs 1.24%).
Which is better, CHD or STZ?
Metric tally: CHD 5 · STZ 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSTZ(lower P/E)
GrowthCHD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSTZ(higher dividend yield)
QualityCHD(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CHD | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.20 | 15.49● |
| Forward P/E | 24.23 | 11.90● |
| P/S ratio | 3.74 | 2.82● |
| P/B ratio | 5.55 | 3.19● |
| PEG ratio | 1.02 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.42 | 11.70● |
| FCF yield | 4.59% | 6.95%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CHD | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.07% | 51.67%● |
| Operating margin | 17.30% | 31.33%● |
| Net margin | 11.81% | 18.46%● |
| ROE | 17.51% | 20.87%● |
| ROIC | 11.19%● | 10.48% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHD | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 2.75%● |
| Payout ratio | 39.64% | 42.52% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHD | STZ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.54%● | 1.19% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.90%● | -1.59% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.43%● | -1.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.10%● | -7.36% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHD or STZ?
- It depends on your goal. value: STZ (lower P/E); growth: CHD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: STZ (higher dividend yield); quality: CHD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, STZ leads 11 to 5.
- Is CHD or STZ cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, STZ is cheaper: CHD trades at a 32.20 P/E and STZ at 15.49.
- Which has grown faster, CHD or STZ?
- Over the past five years, CHD grew revenue faster — CHD at a 4.54% CAGR versus STZ at 1.19%.
- Does CHD or STZ pay a bigger dividend?
- CHD yields 1.24% and STZ yields 2.75% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHD or STZ more profitable?
- STZ runs the higher net margin — CHD at 11.81% versus STZ at 18.46%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHD or STZ?
- Over the past 10-year, CHD delivered the higher annualized total return — CHD at 8.32% versus STZ at 1.25%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Church & Dwight P/E ratioConstellation Brands P/E ratioChurch & Dwight dividend yieldConstellation Brands dividend yieldChurch & Dwight ROEConstellation Brands ROEChurch & Dwight operating marginConstellation Brands operating marginChurch & Dwight revenue growthConstellation Brands revenue growthChurch & Dwight free cash flowConstellation Brands free cash flow
Church & Dwight & Constellation Brands appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.