Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) vs Kellanova (K)
A side-by-side comparison of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Kellanova across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 31, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
$98.81Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 31, 2026, 4:01 PM EDT
K
Kellanova
$83.44Consumer DefensiveAt close: Dec 10, 2025, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — CHD vs K
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 29yCHD +6927.2%K +465.9%CHD compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CHD K
CHD vs K: by the numbers
- •K is the larger company ($29.03B vs $23.41B market cap).
- •K trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (22.90 vs 31.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CHD converts more revenue to profit (11.96% vs 10.08% net margin).
- •CHD grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.30% vs -1.30% CAGR).
- •K pays the higher dividend yield (1.39% vs 1.22%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CHD | K |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 31.87 | 22.90 |
| Forward P/E | 26.28 | 22.06 |
| P/S ratio | 3.78 | 2.30 |
| P/B ratio | 5.41 | 6.95 |
| PEG ratio | 1.01 | 0.50 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.94 | 15.83 |
| FCF yield | 4.74% | 2.05% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHD | K |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.65% | 34.81% |
| Operating margin | 17.47% | 14.61% |
| Net margin | 11.96% | 10.08% |
| ROE | 17.13% | 30.38% |
| ROIC | 11.19% | 12.91% |
Dividends
| Metric | CHD | K |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.22% | 1.39% |
| Payout ratio | 39.64% | 29.59% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHD | K |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.30% | -1.30% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.90% | 0.30% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 12.29% | 13.94% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.90% | 11.22% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHD or K?
- K has the lower trailing P/E: CHD trades at 31.87 and K at 22.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CHD or K?
- Over the past five years, CHD grew revenue faster — CHD at a 4.30% CAGR versus K at -1.30%.
- Does CHD or K pay a bigger dividend?
- CHD yields 1.22% and K yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHD or K more profitable?
- CHD runs the higher net margin — CHD at 11.96% versus K at 10.08%.
- How have CHD and K total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CHD delivered 8.63% and K delivered 5.79% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Church & Dwight P/E ratioKellanova P/E ratioChurch & Dwight dividend yieldKellanova dividend yieldChurch & Dwight ROEKellanova ROEChurch & Dwight operating marginKellanova operating marginChurch & Dwight revenue growthKellanova revenue growthChurch & Dwight free cash flowKellanova free cash flow
Church & Dwight & Kellanova appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 31, 2026.