Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) vs Kellanova (K)
K leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Kellanova across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
$97.56Consumer Defensive
K
Kellanova
$83.44Consumer Defensive
Total return — CHD vs K
growth of $100 · last 29yCHD +4789.3%K +152.3%CHD compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CHD K
CHD vs K: by the numbers
- •K is the larger company ($29.03B vs $23.12B market cap).
- •K trades at the lower earnings multiple (22.90 vs 32.20 P/E).
- •CHD converts more revenue to profit (11.81% vs 10.08% net margin).
- •CHD grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.54% vs -1.30% CAGR).
- •K pays the higher dividend yield (1.39% vs 1.24%).
Which is better, CHD or K?
Metric tally: CHD 7 · K 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueK(lower P/E)
GrowthCHD(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeK(higher dividend yield)
QualityK(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | CHD | K |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 32.20 | 22.90● |
| Forward P/E | 24.23 | 22.06● |
| P/S ratio | 3.74 | 2.30● |
| P/B ratio | 5.55● | 6.95 |
| PEG ratio | 1.02 | 0.51● |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.42 | 15.66● |
| FCF yield | 4.59%● | 2.05% |
Profitability
| Metric | CHD | K |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 45.07%● | 34.81% |
| Operating margin | 17.30%● | 14.61% |
| Net margin | 11.81%● | 10.08% |
| ROE | 17.51% | 30.38%● |
| ROIC | 11.19% | 12.91%● |
Dividends
| Metric | CHD | K |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.24% | 1.39%● |
| Payout ratio | 39.64% | 29.59% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CHD | K |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.54%● | -1.30% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -0.90% | 0.30%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.43%● | -15.22% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.10% | 11.22%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CHD or K?
- It depends on your goal. value: K (lower P/E); growth: CHD (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: K (higher dividend yield); quality: K (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, K leads 10 to 7.
- Is CHD or K cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, K is cheaper: CHD trades at a 32.20 P/E and K at 22.90.
- Which has grown faster, CHD or K?
- Over the past five years, CHD grew revenue faster — CHD at a 4.54% CAGR versus K at -1.30%.
- Does CHD or K pay a bigger dividend?
- CHD yields 1.24% and K yields 1.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CHD or K more profitable?
- CHD runs the higher net margin — CHD at 11.81% versus K at 10.08%.
- Which has been the better investment, CHD or K?
- Over the past 10-year, CHD delivered the higher annualized total return — CHD at 8.32% versus K at 5.79%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Church & Dwight P/E ratioKellanova P/E ratioChurch & Dwight dividend yieldKellanova dividend yieldChurch & Dwight ROEKellanova ROEChurch & Dwight operating marginKellanova operating marginChurch & Dwight revenue growthKellanova revenue growthChurch & Dwight free cash flowKellanova free cash flow
Church & Dwight & Kellanova appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.