City Holding Company (CHCO) vs UMB Financial Corporation (UMBFO)
Over the past year, CHCO outperformed UMBFO — 18.64% vs -0.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of City Holding Company and UMB Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — CHCO vs UMBFO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yMetrics side by side
Did CHCO beat UMBFO?
Over the past year, CHCO outperformed UMBFO — 18.64% vs -0.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | CHCO | UMBFO |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | 18.64% | -0.75% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | 18.36% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.78% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (10Y) | 14.17% | N/A |
UMBFO is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has CHCO beaten UMBFO?
- Over the past year, CHCO outperformed UMBFO — 18.64% vs -0.75% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.