Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHCO or EZPW?

CHCO has the lower trailing P/E: CHCO trades at 15.40 and EZPW at 15.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CHCO or EZPW?

Over the past five years, EZPW grew revenue faster — CHCO at a 10.58% CAGR versus EZPW at 17.62%.

Does CHCO or EZPW pay a bigger dividend?

CHCO pays a dividend (2.45% yield), while EZPW is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is CHCO or EZPW more profitable?

CHCO runs the higher net margin — CHCO at 34.71% versus EZPW at 9.99%.

How have CHCO and EZPW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CHCO delivered 14.17% and EZPW delivered 10.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

City Holding Company (CHCO) vs EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW)

A side-by-side comparison of City Holding Company and EZCORP, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CHCO

City Holding Company

$1.99B

$140.80Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:44 PM EDT

EZPW

EZCORP, Inc.

$1.80B

$30.82Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:45 PM EDT

Total return — CHCO vs EZPW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CHCO +282.3% (+14.4%/yr)EZPW +179.8% (+10.8%/yr)CHCO compounded faster over this window

CHCO EZPW

CHCO vs EZPW: by the numbers

•CHCO is the larger company ($1.99B vs $1.80B market cap).
•CHCO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (15.40 vs 15.72 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CHCO converts more revenue to profit (34.71% vs 9.99% net margin).
•EZPW grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.62% vs 10.58% CAGR).
•CHCO pays a dividend (2.45% yield), while EZPW is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CHCO	EZPW
P/E ratio	15.40	15.72
Forward P/E	15.18	14.15
PEG ratio	1.54	N/A
P/S ratio	5.23	1.14
P/B ratio	2.46	1.55
EV / EBITDA	N/A	8.99
FCF yield	N/A	7.78%

Profitability

Metric	CHCO	EZPW
Gross margin	N/A	57.95%
Operating margin	38.00%	13.90%
Net margin	34.71%	9.99%
ROE	16.29%	13.59%
ROIC	N/A	8.49%

City Holding Company: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.

Dividends

Metric	CHCO	EZPW
Dividend yield	2.45%	N/A
Payout ratio	38.07%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CHCO	EZPW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.58%	17.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	10.01%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	108.79%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.78%	31.94%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CHCO or EZPW?: CHCO has the lower trailing P/E: CHCO trades at 15.40 and EZPW at 15.72. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CHCO or EZPW?: Over the past five years, EZPW grew revenue faster — CHCO at a 10.58% CAGR versus EZPW at 17.62%.
Does CHCO or EZPW pay a bigger dividend?: CHCO pays a dividend (2.45% yield), while EZPW is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is CHCO or EZPW more profitable?: CHCO runs the higher net margin — CHCO at 34.71% versus EZPW at 9.99%.
How have CHCO and EZPW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CHCO delivered 14.17% and EZPW delivered 10.89% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CHCO analysis Full EZPW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

City P/E ratio EZCORP P/E ratio City dividend yield City ROE EZCORP ROE City operating margin EZCORP operating margin City revenue growth EZCORP revenue growth EZCORP free cash flow

City & EZCORP appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.