Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. (CGEM) vs Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX)

A side-by-side comparison of Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. and Pacira BioSciences, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CGEM vs PCRX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
CGEM -46.4% (-9.9%/yr)PCRX -58.6% (-13.7%/yr)CGEM compounded faster over this window
50100150Start $10020222023202420252026$54$41
CGEM PCRX

CGEM vs PCRX: by the numbers

  • •CGEM is the larger company ($1.01B vs $971M market cap).
  • •PCRX is profitable (1.96% net margin) while CGEM runs a net loss (0.00%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCGEMPCRX
P/E ratioN/A70.30
P/S ratioN/A1.30
P/B ratio3.131.45
EV / EBITDAN/A11.37
FCF yieldN/A18.48%

Profitability

MetricCGEMPCRX
Gross margin0.00%79.21%
Operating margin0.00%2.47%
Net margin0.00%1.96%
ROE-63.62%2.18%
ROIC-68.64%1.35%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCGEMPCRX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A8.20%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A-45.77%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A16.72%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-7.48%-12.27%

Frequently asked

Is CGEM or PCRX more profitable?
PCRX runs the higher net margin — CGEM at 0.00% versus PCRX at 1.96%.
How have CGEM and PCRX total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, CGEM delivered -7.48% and PCRX delivered -12.27% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.