Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. (CGEM) vs Harrow Health, Inc. (HROW)

A side-by-side comparison of Cullinan Therapeutics, Inc. and Harrow Health, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CGEM vs HROW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
CGEM -46.4% (-9.9%/yr)HROW +282.2% (+25.0%/yr)HROW compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001kStart $10020222023202420252026$54$382
CGEM HROW

CGEM vs HROW: by the numbers

  • •HROW is the larger company ($1.13B vs $1.08B market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; CGEM's is the smaller (0.00% vs -13.51% net margin).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCGEMHROW
P/S ratioN/A4.11
P/B ratio3.3574.56
FCF yieldN/A0.47%

Profitability

MetricCGEMHROW
Gross margin0.00%73.28%
Operating margin0.00%14.18%
Net margin0.00%-13.51%
ROE-63.62%-244.91%
ROIC-68.64%1.81%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCGEMHROW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)N/A34.52%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-7.48%27.66%

Frequently asked

How have CGEM and HROW total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, CGEM delivered -7.48% and HROW delivered 27.66% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.