Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) vs Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. (OBIO)

A side-by-side comparison of Canopy Growth Corporation and Orchestra BioMed Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — CGC vs OBIO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y
CGC -99.5% (-58.9%/yr)OBIO -47.1% (-10.1%/yr)OBIO compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
01101001kStart $100202120222023202420252026$0$53
CGC OBIO

CGC vs OBIO: by the numbers

  • •CGC is the larger company ($375M vs $351M market cap).
  • •Both run net losses; CGC's is the smaller (-81.04% vs -184.60% net margin).
  • •OBIO grew revenue faster over the past five years (148.45% vs -12.47% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricCGCOBIO
P/S ratio1.6210.97
P/B ratio0.7718.16

Profitability

MetricCGCOBIO
Gross margin25.47%99.32%
Operating margin-31.98%-154.73%
Net margin-81.04%-184.60%
ROE-38.57%-200.64%
ROIC-10.85%-56.73%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCGCOBIO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)-12.47%148.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)-63.36%-9.35%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CGC or OBIO?
Over the past five years, OBIO grew revenue faster — CGC at a -12.47% CAGR versus OBIO at 148.45%.
How have CGC and OBIO total returns compared?
Over the past 5 years, CGC delivered -63.36% and OBIO delivered -9.35% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.