Which has the lower trailing P/E, CF or RPM?

CF has the lower trailing P/E: CF trades at 8.73 and RPM at 21.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CF or RPM?

Over the past five years, CF grew revenue faster — CF at a 11.04% CAGR versus RPM at 5.19%.

Does CF or RPM pay a bigger dividend?

CF yields 1.70% and RPM yields 1.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is CF or RPM more profitable?

CF runs the higher net margin — CF at 27.12% versus RPM at 8.41%.

How have CF and RPM total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CF delivered 20.73% and RPM delivered 9.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) vs RPM International Inc. (RPM)

A side-by-side comparison of CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and RPM International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 18, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CF Industries Holdings, Inc.

$18.39B

$119.72Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 18, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

RPM

RPM International Inc.

$14.12B

$110.55Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Aug 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CF vs RPM

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CF +537.7% (+20.4%/yr)RPM +153.6% (+9.8%/yr)CF compounded faster over this window

CF RPM

CF vs RPM: by the numbers

•CF is the larger company ($18.39B vs $14.12B market cap).
•CF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.73 vs 21.71 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CF converts more revenue to profit (27.12% vs 8.41% net margin).
•CF grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.04% vs 5.19% CAGR).
•RPM pays the higher dividend yield (1.92% vs 1.70%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CF	RPM
P/E ratio	8.73	21.71
Forward P/E	7.06	20.39
P/S ratio	2.34	1.82
P/B ratio	3.15	4.32
EV / EBITDA	5.02	13.22
FCF yield	10.54%	4.72%

Profitability

Metric	CF	RPM
Gross margin	42.54%	41.44%
Operating margin	38.12%	12.29%
Net margin	27.12%	8.41%
ROE	36.52%	19.97%
ROIC	14.27%	10.51%

Dividends

Metric	CF	RPM
Dividend yield	1.70%	1.92%
Payout ratio	22.27%	41.62%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CF	RPM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.04%	5.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	43.52%	5.94%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	17.64%	2.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	23.46%	7.50%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CF or RPM?: CF has the lower trailing P/E: CF trades at 8.73 and RPM at 21.71. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CF or RPM?: Over the past five years, CF grew revenue faster — CF at a 11.04% CAGR versus RPM at 5.19%.
Does CF or RPM pay a bigger dividend?: CF yields 1.70% and RPM yields 1.92% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is CF or RPM more profitable?: CF runs the higher net margin — CF at 27.12% versus RPM at 8.41%.
How have CF and RPM total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CF delivered 20.73% and RPM delivered 9.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CF analysis Full RPM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

CF Industries P/E ratio RPM International P/E ratio CF Industries dividend yield RPM International dividend yield CF Industries ROE RPM International ROE CF Industries operating margin RPM International operating margin CF Industries revenue growth RPM International revenue growth CF Industries free cash flow RPM International free cash flow

CF Industries & RPM International appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 18, 2026.