CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) vs RPM International Inc. (RPM)
CF leads on 14 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of CF Industries Holdings, Inc. and RPM International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 4, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
$110.54Basic Materials
RPM
RPM International Inc.
$111.62Basic Materials
Total return — CF vs RPM
growth of $100 · last 21yCF +3311.7%RPM +506.0%CF compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CF RPM
CF vs RPM: by the numbers
- •CF is the larger company ($16.98B vs $14.25B market cap).
- •CF trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.93 vs 21.51 P/E).
- •CF converts more revenue to profit (23.73% vs 8.63% net margin).
- •CF grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.01% vs 5.79% CAGR).
- •RPM pays the higher dividend yield (1.94% vs 1.81%).
Which is better, CF or RPM?
Metric tally: CF 14 · RPM 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCF(lower P/E)
GrowthCF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeRPM(higher dividend yield)
QualityCF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CF | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.93● | 21.51 |
| Forward P/E | 6.44● | 20.30 |
| P/S ratio | 2.31 | 1.85● |
| P/B ratio | 3.20● | 4.53 |
| PEG ratio | 0.26● | 1.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.26● | 14.86 |
| FCF yield | 9.49%● | 4.04% |
Profitability
| Metric | CF | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 40.41% | 41.36%● |
| Operating margin | 35.68%● | 11.99% |
| Net margin | 23.73%● | 8.63% |
| ROE | 32.91%● | 21.16% |
| ROIC | 14.27%● | 12.50% |
Dividends
| Metric | CF | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.81% | 1.94%● |
| Payout ratio | 22.27% | 40.15% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CF | RPM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.01%● | 5.79% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 43.52%● | 18.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.13%● | -3.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.94%● | 6.28% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CF or RPM?
- It depends on your goal. value: CF (lower P/E); growth: CF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RPM (higher dividend yield); quality: CF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CF leads 14 to 3.
- Is CF or RPM cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CF is cheaper: CF trades at a 9.93 P/E and RPM at 21.51.
- Which has grown faster, CF or RPM?
- Over the past five years, CF grew revenue faster — CF at a 12.01% CAGR versus RPM at 5.79%.
- Does CF or RPM pay a bigger dividend?
- CF yields 1.81% and RPM yields 1.94% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is CF or RPM more profitable?
- CF runs the higher net margin — CF at 23.73% versus RPM at 8.63%.
- Which has been the better investment, CF or RPM?
- Over the past 10-year, CF delivered the higher annualized total return — CF at 19.60% versus RPM at 10.49%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
CF Industries P/E ratioRPM International P/E ratioCF Industries dividend yieldRPM International dividend yieldCF Industries ROERPM International ROECF Industries operating marginRPM International operating marginCF Industries revenue growthRPM International revenue growthCF Industries free cash flowRPM International free cash flow
CF Industries & RPM International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 4, 2026.