Capstone Energy+, Inc. (CEPL) vs Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK)
A side-by-side comparison of Capstone Energy+, Inc. and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CEPL
Capstone Energy+, Inc.
$4.34IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:05 PM EDT
TUSK
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.
$2.92IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 3:05 PM EDT
Total return — CEPL vs TUSK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yCEPL -65.3% (-65.3%/yr)TUSK -6.6% (-6.6%/yr)TUSK compounded faster over this window
CEPL TUSK
CEPL vs TUSK: by the numbers
- •TUSK is the larger company ($141M vs $140M market cap).
- •CEPL converts more revenue to profit (3.45% vs 1.23% net margin).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CEPL | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | N/A | 197.30 |
| Forward P/E | 43.57 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 1.36 | 2.33 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 0.54 |
| EV / EBITDA | 15.96 | N/A |
| FCF yield | 2.06% | N/A |
Profitability
| Metric | CEPL | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 34.03% | -19.33% |
| Operating margin | 4.40% | -63.52% |
| Net margin | 3.45% | 1.23% |
| ROE | 11.99% | 0.28% |
| ROIC | 7.05% | -8.10% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CEPL | TUSK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -25.88% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -2.17% |
Frequently asked
- Is CEPL or TUSK more profitable?
- CEPL runs the higher net margin — CEPL at 3.45% versus TUSK at 1.23%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.