Which has the lower trailing P/E, CENT or LRN?

LRN has the lower trailing P/E: CENT trades at 14.85 and LRN at 11.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CENT or LRN?

Over the past five years, LRN grew revenue faster — CENT at a -0.98% CAGR versus LRN at 10.38%.

Is CENT or LRN more profitable?

LRN runs the higher net margin — CENT at 5.39% versus LRN at 13.43%.

How have CENT and LRN total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CENT delivered 6.70% and LRN delivered 18.75% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) vs Stride, Inc. (LRN)

A side-by-side comparison of Central Garden & Pet Company and Stride, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CENT

Central Garden & Pet Company

$2.49B

$39.79Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:04 AM EDT

LRN

Stride, Inc.

$3.36B

$79.10Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 10:05 AM EDT

Total return — CENT vs LRN

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CENT +96.2% (+7.0%/yr)LRN +450.5% (+18.6%/yr)LRN compounded faster over this window

CENT LRN

CENT vs LRN: by the numbers

•LRN is the larger company ($3.36B vs $2.49B market cap).
•LRN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.08 vs 14.85 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•LRN converts more revenue to profit (13.43% vs 5.39% net margin).
•LRN grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.38% vs -0.98% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CENT	LRN
P/E ratio	14.85	11.08
Forward P/E	12.74	10.66
PEG ratio	4.95	0.33
P/S ratio	0.81	1.34
P/B ratio	1.43	2.06
EV / EBITDA	7.73	5.47
FCF yield	13.88%	10.55%

Profitability

Metric	CENT	LRN
Gross margin	32.54%	37.75%
Operating margin	8.11%	17.90%
Net margin	5.39%	13.43%
ROE	9.53%	20.72%
ROIC	5.88%	16.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CENT	LRN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.98%	10.38%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	2.96%	34.80%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	4.25%	34.09%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	0.96%	16.74%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CENT or LRN?: LRN has the lower trailing P/E: CENT trades at 14.85 and LRN at 11.08. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CENT or LRN?: Over the past five years, LRN grew revenue faster — CENT at a -0.98% CAGR versus LRN at 10.38%.
Is CENT or LRN more profitable?: LRN runs the higher net margin — CENT at 5.39% versus LRN at 13.43%.
How have CENT and LRN total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CENT delivered 6.70% and LRN delivered 18.75% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CENT analysis Full LRN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Central Garden & Pet P/E ratio Stride P/E ratio Central Garden & Pet ROE Stride ROE Central Garden & Pet operating margin Stride operating margin Central Garden & Pet revenue growth Stride revenue growth Central Garden & Pet free cash flow Stride free cash flow

Central Garden & Pet & Stride appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.