Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Universal Corporation (UVV)
CELH leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics, though UVV is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Universal Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$29.85Consumer Defensive
UVV
Universal Corporation
$53.79Consumer Defensive
Total return — CELH vs UVV
growth of $100 · last 19yCELH +123.9%UVV +14.3%CELH compounded faster
CELH UVV
CELH vs UVV: by the numbers
- •CELH is the larger company ($7.63B vs $1.34B market cap).
- •UVV trades at the lower earnings multiple (41.38 vs 74.63 P/E).
- •CELH converts more revenue to profit (5.85% vs 1.12% net margin).
- •CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 8.08% CAGR).
- •UVV pays a dividend (6.17% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.
Which is better, CELH or UVV?
Metric tally: CELH 8 · UVV 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueUVV(lower P/E)
GrowthCELH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCELH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CELH | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 74.63 | 41.38● |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.90 |
| P/S ratio | 2.61 | 0.46● |
| P/B ratio | 6.20 | 0.96● |
| PEG ratio | 1.69 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.96 | 8.52● |
| FCF yield | 3.78% | 5.92%● |
Profitability
| Metric | CELH | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.62%● | 17.47% |
| Operating margin | 18.63%● | 7.13% |
| Net margin | 5.85%● | 1.12% |
| ROE | 13.89%● | 2.31% |
| ROIC | 10.01%● | 4.61% |
Dividends
| Metric | CELH | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 6.17% |
| Payout ratio | — | 255.38% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CELH | UVV |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 81.07%● | 8.08% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.28%● | -18.20% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 142.28%● | -12.25% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.35% | 5.46%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, CELH or UVV?
- It depends on your goal. value: UVV (lower P/E); growth: CELH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CELH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CELH leads 8 to 6.
- Is CELH or UVV cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, UVV is cheaper: CELH trades at a 74.63 P/E and UVV at 41.38.
- Which has grown faster, CELH or UVV?
- Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus UVV at 8.08%.
- Does CELH or UVV pay a bigger dividend?
- UVV pays a dividend (6.17% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.
- Is CELH or UVV more profitable?
- CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus UVV at 1.12%.
- Which has been the better investment, CELH or UVV?
- Over the past 10-year, CELH delivered the higher annualized total return — CELH at 43.65% versus UVV at 5.39%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celsius P/E ratioUniversal P/E ratioCelsius dividend yieldUniversal dividend yieldCelsius ROEUniversal ROECelsius operating marginUniversal operating marginCelsius revenue growthUniversal revenue growthCelsius free cash flowUniversal free cash flow
Celsius & Universal appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.