Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or UVV?

UVV has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 133.76 and UVV at 60.82. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CELH or UVV?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus UVV at 7.19%.

Does CELH or UVV pay a bigger dividend?

UVV pays a dividend (7.12% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CELH or UVV more profitable?

CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus UVV at 0.67%.

How have CELH and UVV total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 44.33% and UVV delivered 2.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Universal Corporation (UVV)

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Universal Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 12, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$7.04B

$27.55Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 1:50 PM EDT

UVV

Universal Corporation

$1.14B

$45.68Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Aug 12, 2026, 1:50 PM EDT

Total return — CELH vs UVV

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CELH +3783.4% (+44.2%/yr)UVV +33.5% (+2.9%/yr)CELH compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CELH UVV

CELH vs UVV: by the numbers

•CELH is the larger company ($7.04B vs $1.14B market cap).
•UVV trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (60.82 vs 133.76 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CELH converts more revenue to profit (3.62% vs 0.67% net margin).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (74.65% vs 7.19% CAGR).
•UVV pays a dividend (7.12% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CELH	UVV
P/E ratio	133.76	60.82
P/S ratio	2.37	0.41
P/B ratio	6.02	0.83
EV / EBITDA	26.09	9.59
FCF yield	6.41%	14.18%

Profitability

Metric	CELH	UVV
Gross margin	48.76%	16.82%
Operating margin	18.63%	6.20%
Net margin	3.62%	0.67%
ROE	9.19%	1.38%
ROIC	10.01%	4.61%

Dividends

Metric	CELH	UVV
Dividend yield	N/A	7.12%
Payout ratio	N/A	253.08%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CELH	UVV
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	74.65%	7.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.28%	-18.20%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	152.98%	-12.25%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	1.61%	4.46%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or UVV?: UVV has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 133.76 and UVV at 60.82. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CELH or UVV?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus UVV at 7.19%.
Does CELH or UVV pay a bigger dividend?: UVV pays a dividend (7.12% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CELH or UVV more profitable?: CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus UVV at 0.67%.
How have CELH and UVV total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 44.33% and UVV delivered 2.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysis Full UVV analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratio Universal P/E ratio Universal dividend yield Celsius ROE Universal ROE Celsius operating margin Universal operating margin Celsius revenue growth Universal revenue growth Celsius free cash flow Universal free cash flow

Celsius & Universal appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 12, 2026.