Which has grown faster, CELH or TAP?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.

Does CELH or TAP pay a bigger dividend?

TAP pays a dividend (4.62% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CELH or TAP more profitable?

CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus TAP at -18.85%.

How have CELH and TAP total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 45.37% and TAP delivered -5.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP)

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Molson Coors Beverage Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$7.53B

$29.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

TAP

Molson Coors Beverage Company

$7.97B

$42.51Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CELH vs TAP

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 20y

CELH +113.6%TAP +71.5%CELH compounded faster

CELH TAP

CELH vs TAP: by the numbers

•TAP is the larger company ($7.97B vs $7.53B market cap).
•CELH is profitable (5.85% net margin) while TAP runs a net loss (-18.85%).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 3.44% CAGR).
•TAP pays a dividend (4.62% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CELH	TAP
P/E ratio	71.97	N/A
Forward P/E	N/A	8.74
P/S ratio	2.52	0.70
P/B ratio	5.98	0.77
PEG ratio	1.63	N/A
EV / EBITDA	27.17	N/A
FCF yield	3.91%	14.97%

Profitability

Metric	CELH	TAP
Gross margin	49.62%	37.83%
Operating margin	18.63%	-20.28%
Net margin	5.85%	-18.85%
ROE	13.89%	-20.98%
ROIC	10.01%	-10.20%

Dividends

Metric	CELH	TAP
Dividend yield	N/A	4.62%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CELH	TAP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	81.07%	3.44%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.28%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	142.28%	-0.97%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.29%	-0.71%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CELH or TAP?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus TAP at 3.44%.
Does CELH or TAP pay a bigger dividend?: TAP pays a dividend (4.62% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CELH or TAP more profitable?: CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus TAP at -18.85%.
How have CELH and TAP total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 45.37% and TAP delivered -5.43% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysis Full TAP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratio Molson Coors Beverage P/E ratio Celsius dividend yield Molson Coors Beverage dividend yield Celsius ROE Molson Coors Beverage ROE Celsius operating margin Molson Coors Beverage operating margin Celsius revenue growth Molson Coors Beverage revenue growth Celsius free cash flow Molson Coors Beverage free cash flow

Celsius & Molson Coors Beverage appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.