Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM)
A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and The J. M. Smucker Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$27.63Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SJM
The J. M. Smucker Company
$121.70Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CELH vs SJM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCELH +3844.9% (+44.4%/yr)SJM +17.3% (+1.6%/yr)CELH compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CELH SJM
CELH vs SJM: by the numbers
- •SJM is the larger company ($13.01B vs $7.06B market cap).
- •SJM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (56.87 vs 131.57 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •CELH converts more revenue to profit (3.62% vs 2.51% net margin).
- •CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (74.65% vs 3.03% CAGR).
- •SJM pays a dividend (3.65% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CELH | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 131.57 | 56.87 |
| P/S ratio | 2.32 | 1.42 |
| P/B ratio | 2.39 | 2.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.54 | 8.44 |
| FCF yield | 6.55% | 12.21% |
Profitability
| Metric | CELH | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.76% | 38.65% |
| Operating margin | 18.63% | 19.69% |
| Net margin | 3.62% | 2.51% |
| ROE | 3.73% | 3.99% |
| ROIC | 5.33% | 6.96% |
Dividends
| Metric | CELH | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.65% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 206.54% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CELH | SJM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 74.65% | 3.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.28% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 152.98% | -1.68% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.24% | 3.54% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or SJM?
- SJM has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 131.57 and SJM at 56.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CELH or SJM?
- Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus SJM at 3.03%.
- Does CELH or SJM pay a bigger dividend?
- SJM pays a dividend (3.65% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CELH or SJM more profitable?
- CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus SJM at 2.51%.
- How have CELH and SJM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 44.18% and SJM delivered 2.04% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celsius P/E ratioJ. M. Smucker P/E ratioJ. M. Smucker dividend yieldCelsius ROEJ. M. Smucker ROECelsius operating marginJ. M. Smucker operating marginCelsius revenue growthJ. M. Smucker revenue growthCelsius free cash flowJ. M. Smucker free cash flow
Celsius & J. M. Smucker appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.