Which has grown faster, CELH or SJM?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus SJM at 2.49%.

Does CELH or SJM pay a bigger dividend?

SJM pays a dividend (3.78% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.

Is CELH or SJM more profitable?

CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus SJM at -1.53%.

Which has been the better investment, CELH or SJM?

Over the past 10-year, CELH delivered the higher annualized total return — CELH at 42.62% versus SJM at 1.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs The J. M. Smucker Company (SJM)

CELH leads on 10 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and The J. M. Smucker Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$7.46B

$29.18Consumer Defensive

SJM

The J. M. Smucker Company

$12.42B

$116.49Consumer Defensive

Total return — CELH vs SJM

growth of $100 · last 19y

CELH +118.9%SJM +148.1%SJM compounded faster

CELH SJM

CELH vs SJM: by the numbers

•SJM is the larger company ($12.42B vs $7.46B market cap).
•CELH is profitable (5.85% net margin) while SJM runs a net loss (-1.53%).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 2.49% CAGR).
•SJM pays a dividend (3.78% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CELH or SJM?

Metric tally: CELH 10 · SJM 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthCELH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityCELH(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	CELH	SJM
P/E ratio	72.95	—
Forward P/E	—	11.69
P/S ratio	2.55	1.37●
P/B ratio	6.06	2.24●
PEG ratio	1.65	—
EV / EBITDA	31.73●	36.76
FCF yield	3.86%	9.30%●

Profitability

Metric	CELH	SJM
Gross margin	49.62%●	33.53%
Operating margin	10.40%●	3.98%
Net margin	5.85%●	-1.53%
ROE	13.89%●	-2.50%
ROIC	10.01%●	2.53%

Dividends

Metric	CELH	SJM
Dividend yield	—	3.78%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CELH	SJM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	81.07%●	2.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.28%●	9.57%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	142.28%●	-1.68%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.53%●	0.30%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CELH or SJM?: It depends on your goal. growth: CELH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CELH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, CELH leads 10 to 3.
Which has grown faster, CELH or SJM?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus SJM at 2.49%.
Does CELH or SJM pay a bigger dividend?: SJM pays a dividend (3.78% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.
Is CELH or SJM more profitable?: CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus SJM at -1.53%.
Which has been the better investment, CELH or SJM?: Over the past 10-year, CELH delivered the higher annualized total return — CELH at 42.62% versus SJM at 1.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysis Full SJM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratio J. M. Smucker P/E ratio Celsius dividend yield J. M. Smucker dividend yield Celsius ROE J. M. Smucker ROE Celsius operating margin J. M. Smucker operating margin Celsius revenue growth J. M. Smucker revenue growth Celsius free cash flow J. M. Smucker free cash flow

Celsius & J. M. Smucker appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.