Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CELH is classified in Consumer Defensive; QCOM is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$29.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$162.88TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CELH vs QCOM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 20yCELH +113.6%QCOM +597.2%QCOM compounded faster
CELH QCOM
CELH vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($171.68B vs $7.53B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.24 vs 71.97 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (22.31% vs 5.85% net margin).
- •CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 8.63% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CELH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 71.97 | 18.24 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 15.79 |
| P/S ratio | 2.52 | 4.10 |
| P/B ratio | 5.98 | 6.68 |
| PEG ratio | 1.63 | 3.18 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.17 | 14.61 |
| FCF yield | 3.91% | 6.86% |
Profitability
| Metric | CELH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.62% | 54.80% |
| Operating margin | 18.63% | 25.52% |
| Net margin | 5.85% | 22.31% |
| ROE | 13.89% | 36.38% |
| ROIC | 10.01% | 13.15% |
Dividends
| Metric | CELH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 2.11% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 70.95% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CELH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 81.07% | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.28% | 5.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 142.28% | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.29% | 6.10% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or QCOM?
- QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 71.97 and QCOM at 18.24. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CELH or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus QCOM at 8.63%.
- Does CELH or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- QCOM pays a dividend (2.11% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CELH or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus QCOM at 22.31%.
- How have CELH and QCOM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 45.37% and QCOM delivered 13.58% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celsius P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioCelsius dividend yieldQUALCOMM dividend yieldCelsius ROEQUALCOMM ROECelsius operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginCelsius revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthCelsius free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Celsius & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.