Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)
A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and QUALCOMM Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: CELH is classified in Consumer Defensive; QCOM is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$27.22Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
$181.97TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — CELH vs QCOM
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yCELH +4434.8% (+46.4%/yr)QCOM +266.0% (+13.9%/yr)CELH compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
CELH QCOM
CELH vs QCOM: by the numbers
- •QCOM is the larger company ($191.07B vs $6.96B market cap).
- •QCOM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.77 vs 129.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •QCOM converts more revenue to profit (21.01% vs 3.62% net margin).
- •CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (74.65% vs 6.23% CAGR).
- •QCOM pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CELH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 129.62 | 20.77 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 17.26 |
| P/S ratio | 2.28 | 4.34 |
| P/B ratio | 2.35 | 6.91 |
| EV / EBITDA | 25.16 | 17.11 |
| FCF yield | 6.65% | 5.45% |
Profitability
| Metric | CELH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.76% | 54.23% |
| Operating margin | 18.63% | 23.19% |
| Net margin | 3.62% | 21.01% |
| ROE | 3.73% | 33.48% |
| ROIC | 5.33% | 17.42% |
Dividends
| Metric | CELH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 2.05% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 41.32% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CELH | QCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 74.65% | 6.23% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.28% | 2.02% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 152.98% | 2.09% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -2.24% | 6.80% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or QCOM?
- QCOM has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 129.62 and QCOM at 20.77. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CELH or QCOM?
- Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus QCOM at 6.23%.
- Does CELH or QCOM pay a bigger dividend?
- QCOM pays a dividend (2.05% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CELH or QCOM more profitable?
- QCOM runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus QCOM at 21.01%.
- How have CELH and QCOM total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 44.18% and QCOM delivered 14.33% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celsius P/E ratioQUALCOMM P/E ratioQUALCOMM dividend yieldCelsius ROEQUALCOMM ROECelsius operating marginQUALCOMM operating marginCelsius revenue growthQUALCOMM revenue growthCelsius free cash flowQUALCOMM free cash flow
Celsius & QUALCOMM appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.