Which has grown faster, CELH or MSC?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus MSC at 77.20%.

Is CELH or MSC more profitable?

CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus MSC at -5.63%.

How have CELH and MSC total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, CELH delivered 45.37% and MSC delivered -29.08% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs Studio City International Holdings Limited (MSC)

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and Studio City International Holdings Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: CELH is classified in Consumer Defensive; MSC is classified in Consumer Cyclical. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$7.53B

$29.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MSC

Studio City International Holdings Limited

$85M

$1.77Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 3:08 PM EDT

Total return — CELH vs MSC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 8y

CELH +2214.6%MSC -88.7%CELH compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CELH MSC

CELH vs MSC: by the numbers

•CELH is the larger company ($7.53B vs $85M market cap).
•CELH is profitable (5.85% net margin) while MSC runs a net loss (-5.63%).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 77.20% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CELH	MSC
P/E ratio	71.97	N/A
P/S ratio	2.52	0.12
P/B ratio	5.98	0.17
PEG ratio	1.63	N/A
EV / EBITDA	27.17	6.89
FCF yield	3.91%	43.29%

Profitability

Metric	CELH	MSC
Gross margin	49.62%	68.05%
Operating margin	18.63%	11.60%
Net margin	5.85%	-5.63%
ROE	13.89%	-7.94%
ROIC	10.01%	2.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CELH	MSC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	81.07%	77.20%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.28%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	142.28%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	5.29%	-29.08%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, CELH or MSC?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus MSC at 77.20%.
Is CELH or MSC more profitable?: CELH runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus MSC at -5.63%.
How have CELH and MSC total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, CELH delivered 45.37% and MSC delivered -29.08% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysis Full MSC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratio Studio City International P/E ratio Celsius dividend yield Studio City International dividend yield Celsius ROE Studio City International ROE Celsius operating margin Studio City International operating margin Celsius revenue growth Studio City International revenue growth Celsius free cash flow Studio City International free cash flow

Celsius & Studio City International appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.