Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or MKC?

MKC has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 135.48 and MKC at 8.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, CELH or MKC?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus MKC at 4.15%.

Does CELH or MKC pay a bigger dividend?

MKC pays a dividend (3.68% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is CELH or MKC more profitable?

MKC runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus MKC at 22.05%.

How have CELH and MKC total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 44.18% and MKC delivered 2.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC)

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$7.27B

$28.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MKC

McCormick & Company, Incorporated

$13.55B

$50.39Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 14, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — CELH vs MKC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

CELH +3844.9% (+44.4%/yr)MKC +22.5% (+2.1%/yr)CELH compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

CELH MKC

CELH vs MKC: by the numbers

•MKC is the larger company ($13.55B vs $7.27B market cap).
•MKC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.38 vs 135.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MKC converts more revenue to profit (22.05% vs 3.62% net margin).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (74.65% vs 4.15% CAGR).
•MKC pays a dividend (3.68% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	CELH	MKC
P/E ratio	135.48	8.38
Forward P/E	N/A	16.33
P/S ratio	2.39	1.83
P/B ratio	2.46	1.94
EV / EBITDA	26.29	13.06
FCF yield	6.36%	7.29%

Profitability

Metric	CELH	MKC
Gross margin	48.76%	38.62%
Operating margin	18.63%	15.34%
Net margin	3.62%	22.05%
ROE	3.73%	23.28%
ROIC	5.33%	6.16%

Dividends

Metric	CELH	MKC
Dividend yield	N/A	3.68%
Payout ratio	N/A	31.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	CELH	MKC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	74.65%	4.15%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	44.28%	0.98%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	152.98%	-1.93%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.24%	-7.63%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or MKC?: MKC has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 135.48 and MKC at 8.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, CELH or MKC?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 74.65% CAGR versus MKC at 4.15%.
Does CELH or MKC pay a bigger dividend?: MKC pays a dividend (3.68% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is CELH or MKC more profitable?: MKC runs the higher net margin — CELH at 3.62% versus MKC at 22.05%.
How have CELH and MKC total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 44.18% and MKC delivered 2.65% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysis Full MKC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratio McCormick P/E ratio McCormick dividend yield Celsius ROE McCormick ROE Celsius operating margin McCormick operating margin Celsius revenue growth McCormick revenue growth Celsius free cash flow McCormick free cash flow

Celsius & McCormick appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.