Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC)
A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$28.76Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 3:40 PM EDT
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$51.83Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 3:40 PM EDT
Total return — CELH vs MKC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 20yCELH +120.9%MKC +310.4%MKC compounded faster
CELH MKC
CELH vs MKC: by the numbers
- •MKC is the larger company ($13.93B vs $7.35B market cap).
- •MKC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (8.57 vs 73.63 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •MKC converts more revenue to profit (22.05% vs 5.85% net margin).
- •CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 4.15% CAGR).
- •MKC pays a dividend (3.67% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | CELH | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 73.63 | 8.57 |
| Forward P/E | 18.41 | 16.69 |
| P/S ratio | 2.58 | 1.88 |
| P/B ratio | 6.12 | 1.98 |
| PEG ratio | 1.66 | 8.75 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.66 | 14.03 |
| FCF yield | 3.83% | 8.35% |
Profitability
| Metric | CELH | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 49.62% | 38.62% |
| Operating margin | 18.63% | 15.34% |
| Net margin | 5.85% | 22.05% |
| ROE | 13.89% | 23.28% |
| ROIC | 10.01% | 7.93% |
Dividends
| Metric | CELH | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | N/A | 3.67% |
| Payout ratio | N/A | 64.29% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | CELH | MKC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 81.07% | 4.15% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 44.28% | 0.98% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 142.28% | -1.93% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | -7.37% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, CELH or MKC?
- MKC has the lower trailing P/E: CELH trades at 73.63 and MKC at 8.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, CELH or MKC?
- Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus MKC at 4.15%.
- Does CELH or MKC pay a bigger dividend?
- MKC pays a dividend (3.67% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is CELH or MKC more profitable?
- MKC runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus MKC at 22.05%.
- How have CELH and MKC total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, CELH delivered 45.49% and MKC delivered 2.10% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Celsius P/E ratioMcCormick & P/E ratioCelsius dividend yieldMcCormick & dividend yieldCelsius ROEMcCormick & ROECelsius operating marginMcCormick & operating marginCelsius revenue growthMcCormick & revenue growthCelsius free cash flowMcCormick & free cash flow
Celsius & McCormick & appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.