Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) vs McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC)

MKC leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. and McCormick & Company, Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Celsius Holdings, Inc. logo
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$7.46B
$29.18Consumer Defensive
McCormick & Company, Incorporated logo
MKC
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
$13.16B
$48.95Consumer Defensive

Total return — CELH vs MKC

growth of $100 · last 19y
CELH +118.9%MKC +156.7%MKC compounded faster
0200400600Start $1002011201520192023$219$257
CELH MKC

CELH vs MKC: by the numbers

  • •MKC is the larger company ($13.16B vs $7.46B market cap).
  • •MKC trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.02 vs 72.95 P/E).
  • •MKC converts more revenue to profit (23.12% vs 5.85% net margin).
  • •CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 3.90% CAGR).
  • •MKC pays a dividend (3.80% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.

Which is better, CELH or MKC?

Metric tally: CELH 7 · MKC 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMKC(lower P/E)
GrowthCELH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityCELH(higher ROIC)

Valuation

MetricCELHMKC
P/E ratio72.958.02●
Forward P/E—14.76
P/S ratio2.551.86●
P/B ratio6.061.89●
PEG ratio1.65●8.19
EV / EBITDA31.7313.96●
FCF yield3.86%6.21%●

Profitability

MetricCELHMKC
Gross margin49.62%●37.94%
Operating margin10.40%15.51%●
Net margin5.85%23.12%●
ROE13.89%23.54%●
ROIC10.01%●7.93%

Dividends

MetricCELHMKC
Dividend yield—3.80%
Payout ratio—63.27%

Growth (annualized)

MetricCELHMKC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)81.07%●3.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)44.28%●0.98%
FCF CAGR (5Y)142.28%●2.35%
Total return CAGR (5Y)6.53%●-9.28%

Frequently asked

Which is better, CELH or MKC?
It depends on your goal. value: MKC (lower P/E); growth: CELH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: CELH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MKC leads 8 to 7.
Is CELH or MKC cheaper?
On trailing earnings, MKC is cheaper: CELH trades at a 72.95 P/E and MKC at 8.02.
Which has grown faster, CELH or MKC?
Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — CELH at a 81.07% CAGR versus MKC at 3.90%.
Does CELH or MKC pay a bigger dividend?
MKC pays a dividend (3.80% yield) while CELH does not currently pay one.
Is CELH or MKC more profitable?
MKC runs the higher net margin — CELH at 5.85% versus MKC at 23.12%.
Which has been the better investment, CELH or MKC?
Over the past 10-year, CELH delivered the higher annualized total return — CELH at 42.62% versus MKC at 1.73%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full CELH analysisFull MKC analysisInteractive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Celsius P/E ratioMcCormick & P/E ratioCelsius dividend yieldMcCormick & dividend yieldCelsius ROEMcCormick & ROECelsius operating marginMcCormick & operating marginCelsius revenue growthMcCormick & revenue growthCelsius free cash flowMcCormick & free cash flow

Celsius & McCormick & appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield StocksDividend AristocratsFastest Revenue Growth StocksHighest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.